2014
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.53.1784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coil Migration Following Transcatheter Arterial Embolization

Abstract: A 69-year-old man presented with hypovolemic shock caused by massive gastrointestinal bleeding. Angiography revealed active bleeding in a branch of the gastroduodenal artery (Picture 1a). The patient underwent emergent transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE), and angiography confirmed complete occlusion due to bleeding (Picture 1b). The patient's condition rapidly stabilized; however, esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed seven days after TAE showed the presence of duodenal ulcers and a metal material impacte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shen et al noted no complications approximately 2 months after presentation of coil erosion without surgical or endoscopic intervention. 10 Cases have also reported the coil passing per rectum without complication, which is the likely result of our second case. 5 The number of migrated coils that pass without being detected is unknown as asymptomatic patients are not likely to present and there is no standard follow-up as coils are placed in a wide range of clinical settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Shen et al noted no complications approximately 2 months after presentation of coil erosion without surgical or endoscopic intervention. 10 Cases have also reported the coil passing per rectum without complication, which is the likely result of our second case. 5 The number of migrated coils that pass without being detected is unknown as asymptomatic patients are not likely to present and there is no standard follow-up as coils are placed in a wide range of clinical settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%