1990
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.41.3559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coincidence studies of capture and ionization in highly chargedIq+-He andU

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Bohr-Lindhard model, one-electron release probability f r and capture probability f c are f r = (v e /a)(R r /v p ) and f c = (v e /a)(R c /v p ), respectively. Here, the unitarized probabilities p r and p c are used, which are given as [16,17]:…”
Section: Results Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Bohr-Lindhard model, one-electron release probability f r and capture probability f c are f r = (v e /a)(R r /v p ) and f c = (v e /a)(R c /v p ), respectively. Here, the unitarized probabilities p r and p c are used, which are given as [16,17]:…”
Section: Results Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such deviations are also observed in systematic measurement where fast (3.6 MeV/u ∼ 1 GeV/u) and highly charged (q = 24 ∼ 92) ions are used [14]. As stated by previous authors, helium double ionization for very highly charged ion impact (q/v > 1) is still unclear in strong coupling regimes [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Here the subscripts 1 and 2 represent the first and the second released target electrons, i.e., P I 1 is the ionization probability 022710-2 [16,17]; solid diamond: He 2+ [18]; open circle: present C 4+ data; solid circle: O 7+ [19] and N 7+ data [20]; solid star: Fe 15+ [21]; blue solid circle: Fe 20+ [21] and I 20+ [15]; green diamond: U 36+ [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]; purple diamond: U 44+ data [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]; red star: U 89+ ∼U 92+ data [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]). …”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ECOB and MCBM were verified and compared with many experimental results [13][14][15]. For collisions at medium and high energies where impact ionization occurs [16,17], different models were developed to describe the mechanism, such as the classic trajectory Monte Carlo model (CTMC) [18]. Apart from classic models, models based on the time-dependent two-center Dirac equation have recently been developed by Tupitsyn et al [19,20] and provide good agreement with the experimental data [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%