2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2010.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coincidence-summing correction equations in gamma-ray spectrometry with p-type HPGedetectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution of terms (coincident energies) having coefficients of less than five per thousand is not considered since their contribution in the correction factor is generally on the order of fractions of a percent. The correction equations are found to be comparable with those calculated in other studies [26][27][28], within few percent on the coefficients terms. The ''apparent'' full energy peak efficiency (e p ) and total efficiency (e t ) (Fig.…”
Section: True Coincidence Summing Correctionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The contribution of terms (coincident energies) having coefficients of less than five per thousand is not considered since their contribution in the correction factor is generally on the order of fractions of a percent. The correction equations are found to be comparable with those calculated in other studies [26][27][28], within few percent on the coefficients terms. The ''apparent'' full energy peak efficiency (e p ) and total efficiency (e t ) (Fig.…”
Section: True Coincidence Summing Correctionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The uncertainties of components are assessed either by Type A or by Type B evaluations. Type A evaluation is based on a statistical evaluation of measurement data, as in the case of the counting uncertainty which is normally evaluated Terms for c-KX-ray coincidence summing are taken from bibliography [26][27][28] J Radioanal Nucl Chem according to the Poisson statistics. Type B evaluation is performed by any other method, e.g.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Total Uncertainty Budgetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expressions reported by Tomarchio and Rizzo (Tomarchio and Rizzo, 2011) were used for 22 Na, 24 Na, 60 Co, 88 Y, 110m Ag, and 134 Cs. The results are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Mathematical Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expressions (Tomarchio and Rizzo, 2011) of the coincidence summing correction factor F(E) for 60 Co, 88 Y, 110m Ag, and 134 Cs. εpðEÞ and εt ðEÞ show the full-energy peak efficiency and the total efficiency for γ-rays with an energy E, respectively.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for added accuracy in gamma-ray spectroscopy, the corrections for the coincidence summing effects are highly desirable. Several algorithms and empirical equations have been developed in the literature to take into account these effects (Arnold & Sima, 2004;Blaauw & Gelsema, 2003;Dias, Koskinas, & Takeda, 2002;Tomarchio & Rizzo, 2011;Vidmar, Kanisch, & Vidmar, 2011) The peak-to-total ratio (P/ T) is an established method for coincidence summing effects corrections in the gamma-ray spectrometry field (ANSI, 1999). However, the method is not used in routine measurements due to the elaborate work involved in its implementation, especially for close geometry measurements (Lee, Park, & Woo, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%