1986
DOI: 10.1002/mana.19861270112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coincidence Theorems for Hybrid Contractions

Abstract: A coincidence theorem of GOEBEL [3] (cf. Theorem 1 below) proved in 1968 has recently received some attention. In particular, OKADA [9], SINGH-VIILENDRA [ 131, and SINOH-KULSHRESTHA [ 121 extended Theorem 1 to L-spaces, 2-metric spaces and metric spaces, respectively. Further, PARK [lo] gave a generalization of it. The purpose of this note is to generalize GOEBEL'S result to a hybrid of multivalued and singlevalued maps satisfying a contractive condition. Consequently, fixed point theorems for multivalued maps… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results (theorems and corollaries) extend, generalize, improve and unify a number of results in the existing single-valued, multi-valued and hybrid fixed point theory (see for instance, [3,5,7,8,[10][11][12][13][14][15]17] and references thereof). We mention a few here.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…Our results (theorems and corollaries) extend, generalize, improve and unify a number of results in the existing single-valued, multi-valued and hybrid fixed point theory (see for instance, [3,5,7,8,[10][11][12][13][14][15]17] and references thereof). We mention a few here.…”
supporting
confidence: 75%
“…HA AND Y.J. CHO slngle-valued mappings have recently been studied by Mukherjee [II], Naimpally et al [12], Rhoades et al [I] and Singh et al [2]. In this paper, we consider a very general type of condition involving two multi-valued mappings and a slngle-valued mapping and establish coincidence and fixed point theorems (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…I(q, u) ∈ S(q, u)) for all u ∈ Y . for some t, t 1 ∈ Y and for every u ∈ Y , (ii) there exists a function F ∈ Ψ such that F (H(S(x, u), T (y, u )), d(I(x, u), J(y, u )), d(I(x, u), S(x, u)), d(J(y, u ), T (y, u )), d(I(x, u), T (y, u )), d(J(y, u ), S(x, u))) ≤ 0, (5) for all x, y, u, u ∈ Y . Then (a) If I(Y × Y ) is a closed subset of X , then there exists b ∈ Y such that I(b, u) ∈ S(b, u) for all u ∈ Y ; (b) If J(Y × Y ) is a closed subset of X , then there exists c ∈ Y such that J(c, u ) ∈ T (c, u ) for all u ∈ Y .…”
Section: An Applicationmentioning
confidence: 96%