2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0fd00120a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coincident angle-resolved state-selective photoelectron spectroscopy of acetylene molecules: a candidate system for time-resolved dynamics

Abstract: The acetylene-vinylidene system serves as a benchmark for investigations of ultrafast dynamical processes where the coupling of the electronic and nuclear degrees of freedom provides a fertile playground to explore...

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental measurements regarding the single-photon ionization cross sections at the photon energy used in this work (23.29 eV) support the fact that ionization mainly takes place from the 1π u molecular orbital (ionization potential (IP) = 11.3 eV), as it exhibits the highest partial photoionization cross section in the photon energy region of interest Figure shows the yields for the 1π u , 2σ u , and 3σ g photoelectron channels that are accessible for the photon energy used in this experimental campaign, displayed as a function of the interlaser time delay. The calculated photoelectron signals are also shown in the same figure.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…Experimental measurements regarding the single-photon ionization cross sections at the photon energy used in this work (23.29 eV) support the fact that ionization mainly takes place from the 1π u molecular orbital (ionization potential (IP) = 11.3 eV), as it exhibits the highest partial photoionization cross section in the photon energy region of interest Figure shows the yields for the 1π u , 2σ u , and 3σ g photoelectron channels that are accessible for the photon energy used in this experimental campaign, displayed as a function of the interlaser time delay. The calculated photoelectron signals are also shown in the same figure.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%