1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-1098(96)00763-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coincident two-electron emission from surfaces by low-energy electrons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The probability for the two electrons to be detected with asymptotic momenta k 1 and k 2 is derived from an 0031-9007͞98͞81(16)͞3535(4)$15.00 excitation amplitude, T , that is, to leading order, a sum of direct electron pair excitation amplitude, T ee , and an amplitude, T ec , that involves the scattering of the pair from the crystal potential W ec [10,11] (i.e., atomic units [a.u.] are used throughout)…”
Section: Manifestations Of Electronic Correlations In the Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability for the two electrons to be detected with asymptotic momenta k 1 and k 2 is derived from an 0031-9007͞98͞81(16)͞3535(4)$15.00 excitation amplitude, T , that is, to leading order, a sum of direct electron pair excitation amplitude, T ee , and an amplitude, T ec , that involves the scattering of the pair from the crystal potential W ec [10,11] (i.e., atomic units [a.u.] are used throughout)…”
Section: Manifestations Of Electronic Correlations In the Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low primary electron energies (less than a few 100 eV), the short mean free paths necessitate the observation of the electron pair in the reflection mode for solid surfaces. Substantial experimental and theoretical progress was only made fairly recently (see [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note here that measurements of asymmetry distributions collected under these conditions do not directly represent the density of states as a function of the binding energy or the momentum density distribution because in the low-energy (e, 2e) reaction the cross-section depends on the Coulomb matrix elements and on the reflectivities of the primary and of the ejected electrons at the surface [15]. On the other hand to obtain a significant scattering cross-section an appreciable density of states in momentum space is necessary [15]. Since we intend to outline the spin-dependent features in electronic structure of the films we compare spin-difference and the asymmetries of the constructed distributions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%