2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6826(00)00078-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coincident ultraviolet imager and energetic particle sensor observations of the continuous electron aurora

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea of a two‐component optical auroral oval was first made by Elphinstone et al [1995a, 1995b] who referred to the double oval as a distribution that forms at the beginning of the substorm recovery phase. Carbury et al [2003] fitted a function consisting of a single Gaussian plus a second order polynomial [see also Eastes et al , 2000], although they pointed out that not all auroral latitude profiles could be fitted with a function based on a single Gaussian. Then Mende et al [2003] published an interesting study in which they performed a superposed epoch analysis of 91 substorms using data obtained from the IMAGE spacecraft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of a two‐component optical auroral oval was first made by Elphinstone et al [1995a, 1995b] who referred to the double oval as a distribution that forms at the beginning of the substorm recovery phase. Carbury et al [2003] fitted a function consisting of a single Gaussian plus a second order polynomial [see also Eastes et al , 2000], although they pointed out that not all auroral latitude profiles could be fitted with a function based on a single Gaussian. Then Mende et al [2003] published an interesting study in which they performed a superposed epoch analysis of 91 substorms using data obtained from the IMAGE spacecraft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, the binned latitude profiles are then fit to functions having the form of a Gaussian plus a quadratic background: where λ is the magnetic latitude in degrees, the A i are coefficients of the fit, and F(λ) is the target intensity profile. Admittedly, not all profiles are well fit by , but previous authors have noted the similarity of auroral latitude profiles to Gaussian shapes [e.g., Eastes et al , 2000]. Most profiles are suggestive of such a form, and those which are not are removed by requiring that the fractional standard deviation of the fit be less than 0.20.…”
Section: Fits To Latitude Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%