2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2011.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cointegrated TFP processes and international business cycles

Abstract: A puzzle in international macroeconomics is that observed real exchange rates are highly volatile. Standard international real business cycle (IRBC) models cannot reproduce this fact. We show that total factor productivity processes for the United States and the rest of the world are characterized by a vector error correction model (VECM) and that adding cointegrated technology shocks to the standard IRBC model helps explaining the observed high real exchange rate volatility. Also, we show that the observed in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
62
2
Order By: Relevance
“… See Glick and Rogoff (), Gregory and Head () and Rabanal et al . (). Common technological shocks could reflect, for example, shifts of the global technological frontier.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“… See Glick and Rogoff (), Gregory and Head () and Rabanal et al . (). Common technological shocks could reflect, for example, shifts of the global technological frontier.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Along exactly these lines, however, the results from Table 1 and Figure 2 highlight that even with these restrictions imposed, the estimated model implies that the growth rates of neutral and investment‐specific technological change, though equal in the long run, converge across countries very slowly. This same feature of the estimated model also plays a key role in Rabanal, Rubio‐Ramirez, and Tuesta’s (2009) study, which shows how the extremely slow convergence of productivity trends across countries can work to greatly magnify the responsiveness of the real exchange rate to technology shocks.…”
Section: Empirical Strategy and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The form of the labor adjustment cost must vary across (2) and (3) to reflect the fact that in the model with nonstationary preference shocks, hours worked L H t inherits a stochastic trend from the preference shock M H t and therefore grows in the long run at the same gross rate m as the preference shock itself. Also, as in Rabanal, Rubio‐Ramirez, and Tuesta (2009), both adjustment cost terms must be scaled by a factor U H t , equal to for the model with stationary preference shocks and for the model with nonstationary preference shocks, where Z H t is the home neutral technology shock, V H t is the home investment‐specific technology shock, and the parameter α measures capital’s share in production, so that these costs expand in line with the overall economy in this model with long‐run growth. The bond adjustment cost parameter ϕ d must be strictly positive for the model to have a unique steady‐state growth path, the labor adjustment cost parameter ϕ l is nonnegative, and the form of both adjustment cost specifications is such that the level of these costs is zero along the steady‐state growth path.…”
Section: A Two‐country Stochastic Growth Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let μ A , t ≡ A t / A t − 1 and μA,t*At*true/At1* denote the growth rate of Home and Foreign TFP shocks. The logarithms of μ A , t and μA,t* are assumed to follow the following vector error correction (VEC) processes: italiclog(),μA,ttrue/μtrue¯A=ρAitaliclog(),μA,t1true/μtrue¯AρRitaliclog(),At1true/At1*+εA,t, italiclog(),μA,t*true/μtrue¯A*=ρAitaliclog(),μA,t1*true/μtrue¯A*+ρRitaliclog(),At1true/At1*+εA,t*. A similar VEC representation of the technology processes is also used in Rabanal et al (). They show that the technology processes in the US and the ROW are characterized by a VEC model.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%