2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1368-423x.2004.00130.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cointegration analysis in the presence of outliers

Abstract: The effects of innovational outliers and additive outliers in cointegrated vector autoregressive models are examined and it is analyzed how outliers can be modelled with dummy variables. A Monte Carlo simulation illustrates that additive outliers are more distortionary than innovational outliers, and misspecified dummies may distort inference on the cointegration rank in finite samples. These findings question the common practice in applied cointegration analyses of including unrestricted dummy variables to ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of this, the standard asymptotic trace test distributions (for example, provided by CATS for RATS) are no longer correct. The critical values given in brackets below the test values have been kindly provided by Heino Nielsen using a simulation program described in Nielsen (2004): see also Kurita (2007). The inclusion of a broken linear trend in the cointegration relations shifts the distributions to the right, implying that the test will be undersized if one ignores the e¤ect of the broken trend.…”
Section: Determining the Two Rank Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this, the standard asymptotic trace test distributions (for example, provided by CATS for RATS) are no longer correct. The critical values given in brackets below the test values have been kindly provided by Heino Nielsen using a simulation program described in Nielsen (2004): see also Kurita (2007). The inclusion of a broken linear trend in the cointegration relations shifts the distributions to the right, implying that the test will be undersized if one ignores the e¤ect of the broken trend.…”
Section: Determining the Two Rank Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case the term ω 1 is entirely due to the inconsistent estimation of σ 2 ε . The difference from the general expressions (6) sheds light on why additive and innovational shifts have different effects on finite-sample testing (see, e.g., Nielsen, 2004 Remark 2.11. In Theorem 1 it is imposed that the possible level shifts all have the same size η.…”
Section: Model and Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additive formulation has been analyzed by, e.g., Lütkepohl and Saikkonen (2000a,b,c), Nielsen (2004Nielsen ( , 2007, and Trenkler, Saikkonen, and Lütkepohl (2007); each for speci…c choices of deterministic terms.…”
Section: The Additive Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%