2021
DOI: 10.1097/mjt.0000000000001397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colchicine Treatment in SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: therapeutic option for COVID-19. However, we need more large-scale clinical trials to better characterize the clinical benefits of colchicine in COVID-19.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar trend was observed in the sensitivity analysis. Although earlier meta-analysis performed by Chiu et al, 18 Vrachatis et al, 19 Hariyanto et al, 20 Salah et al, 21 Elshafei et al, 22 Golpour et al, 23 and Beran et al 24 concluded that colchicine may reduce the risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19 infection, we found no mortality benefit when adding colchicine to the usual care of hospitalized patients with this type of viral infection. The discrepancy with our results and with the recent meta-analysis performed by Kow et al 25 and Mehta et al 26 could be partially explained by the inclusion of only randomized clinical trials instead of a mixture of observational plus randomized studies.…”
Section: To the Editorcontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…A similar trend was observed in the sensitivity analysis. Although earlier meta-analysis performed by Chiu et al, 18 Vrachatis et al, 19 Hariyanto et al, 20 Salah et al, 21 Elshafei et al, 22 Golpour et al, 23 and Beran et al 24 concluded that colchicine may reduce the risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19 infection, we found no mortality benefit when adding colchicine to the usual care of hospitalized patients with this type of viral infection. The discrepancy with our results and with the recent meta-analysis performed by Kow et al 25 and Mehta et al 26 could be partially explained by the inclusion of only randomized clinical trials instead of a mixture of observational plus randomized studies.…”
Section: To the Editorcontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…To examine the effectiveness and safety of colchicine in a range of COVID-19 settings, several published meta-analyses have been carried out. The findings of Elshafei et al, Golpour et al, Beran et al, and Salah et al are consistent with each other since they all demonstrated a beneficial effect of colchicine use [ 11 , 13 , 57 , 58 ]. However, there are several issues with the analysis of these studies, as they employed both randomized and observational methods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…To examine the effectiveness and safety of colchicine in a range of COVID-19 settings, several published meta-analyses have been carried out. [11,13,57,58]. However, there are several issues with the analysis of these studies, as they employed both randomized and observational methods.…”
Section: Based On Our Systematic Review Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%