1986
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.2142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cold provocation tests in the evaluation of vibration-induced white finger.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower normal limit of the reduced pressure (FSP(A)) after finger cooling has been used as a criterion56 and has been compared with a hand cooling test in a single study. 6 Nevertheless, Accepted 22 June 1987 only a reduction in pressure to zero (FSP(O) criterion) detects an attack of RP with complete arterial closure.27 The FSP(O) test and the hand cooling testthat is, the finger colour test-have never been compared in the same population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower normal limit of the reduced pressure (FSP(A)) after finger cooling has been used as a criterion56 and has been compared with a hand cooling test in a single study. 6 Nevertheless, Accepted 22 June 1987 only a reduction in pressure to zero (FSP(O) criterion) detects an attack of RP with complete arterial closure.27 The FSP(O) test and the hand cooling testthat is, the finger colour test-have never been compared in the same population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the laboratory assessment metrics employed in this study had been introduced or considered at Suomussalmi. These include cold challenge plethysmography, 30 vibrotactile thresholds, 31 and electrodiagnostic tests. 32 The sensorineural basis of HAVS was clarified on this population.…”
Section: Suomussalmi Forest Worker Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For assessment of digital vascular function by measuring FSBP in subjects exposed to hand-arm vibration, the ISO has standardized the test conditions for optimal provocation, which includes reference measurement at 30°C followed by finger cooling for a period of 5 min at 15 and 10°C without or with additional body cooling 38) . Reported sensitivities and specificities of the local cooling tests with FSBP measurement by plethysmography from different studies are presented in Table 3 6, 25, 39, [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] . Among those reports, a good number of studies demonstrated the sensitivity and specificity of the local cooling test with FSBP measurement to be more than 80%, without additional body cooling, indicating satisfactory diagnostic performance of this method.…”
Section: Strain Gauge Plethysmography (Arterial Occlusion)mentioning
confidence: 99%