2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.12.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cold recovery from LNG-regasification for polygeneration applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of LNG importing terminals however reject their cold energy to the environment (i.e., air or seawater) in either open rack, submerged combustion, or ambient air vaporizers, without cold energy recovery [78]. This is attributable to the following technical and non-technical barriers: (i) communities and cold applications being generally remotely located from regasification terminals, for safety and practical reasons [81], coupled with the lack of suitable fluid carriers for cold transportation; (ii) a lack of perceived incentives for regasification facilities to diversify their products beyond NG distribution, combined with a reluctance to cooperate with potential cold users (e.g., district energy companies), and unsuitable business models; (iii) end-user variable cooling demands and/or resistance to new cold provision technologies [81][82][83].…”
Section: Artificial Coldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The majority of LNG importing terminals however reject their cold energy to the environment (i.e., air or seawater) in either open rack, submerged combustion, or ambient air vaporizers, without cold energy recovery [78]. This is attributable to the following technical and non-technical barriers: (i) communities and cold applications being generally remotely located from regasification terminals, for safety and practical reasons [81], coupled with the lack of suitable fluid carriers for cold transportation; (ii) a lack of perceived incentives for regasification facilities to diversify their products beyond NG distribution, combined with a reluctance to cooperate with potential cold users (e.g., district energy companies), and unsuitable business models; (iii) end-user variable cooling demands and/or resistance to new cold provision technologies [81][82][83].…”
Section: Artificial Coldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanofluids and ice slurries have also been considered but are not suitable for long distance transportation due to high pumping power consumption compared with conventional secondary fluids [81]. Liquid CO 2 has lower viscosity than water/glycol, is non-flammable and considered environmentally benign and low cost [83,84]. CO 2 has been suggested to transport cold energy from LNG regasification terminals [81,83,84] to end-users (e.g., agro-food industries, supermarkets, hypermarkets located 2 km away from an LNG regasification terminal [81,84]).…”
Section: Artificial Coldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…García et al [20] reported that the regasification of LNG is the last step in the LNG supply chain carried out at LNG terminal storage plants [20]. LNG regasification cold energy can be extensively manipulated into useful energy, which can be applied to cold power generation, seawater desalination, polygeneration, cold air separation, cryogenic crushing, frozen food storage, and carbonic acid production [21]. Such applications can prevent vast stores of cold energy from being thrown away during regasification.…”
Section: Data Center Coolingmentioning
confidence: 99%