2016
DOI: 10.1111/pbr.12394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cold tolerance during juvenile development in sorghum: a comparative analysis by genomewide association and linkage mapping

Abstract: Improved cold tolerance during the juvenile phase is a major breeding goal to develop new sorghum cultivars suitable as an alternative energy crop in temperate regions. The objectives of this study were to identify marker‐trait associations for cold tolerance in a sorghum diversity panel fingerprinted with 2620 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and to detect quantitative trait loci (QTL) in two F2:3 populations. Traits of interest were dry matter growth rate (DMGR), leaf appearance rate (LAR), chlor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
24
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After one day of cold stress, the species can be broadly classified as either cold stress insensitive or cold stress sensitive with both maize and sorghum in the cold stress sensitive category. A longer period of cold stress (3 days) demonstrated greater impairment of CO 2 assimilation rates in sorghum than in maize, consistent with previous reports on the relative cold sensitivity of these two species (Chinnusamy et al, 2007;Chopra et al, 2017;Fiedler et al, 2016;Hetherington et al, 1989;Wendorf et al, 1992). S1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…After one day of cold stress, the species can be broadly classified as either cold stress insensitive or cold stress sensitive with both maize and sorghum in the cold stress sensitive category. A longer period of cold stress (3 days) demonstrated greater impairment of CO 2 assimilation rates in sorghum than in maize, consistent with previous reports on the relative cold sensitivity of these two species (Chinnusamy et al, 2007;Chopra et al, 2017;Fiedler et al, 2016;Hetherington et al, 1989;Wendorf et al, 1992). S1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…After 1 d of cold stress, the species could be broadly classified as either cold stress insensitive or cold stress sensitive, with both maize and sorghum in the cold stress sensitive category. A longer period of cold stress (3 d) revealed greater impairment of CO 2 assimilation rates in sorghum than in maize, consistent with previous reports on the relative cold sensitivity of these two species (Chinnusamy et al, 2007;Chopra et al, 2017;Fiedler et al, 2016;Hetherington et al, 1989;Wendorf et al, 1992) and separated the six species into three broad categories of cold tolerant, moderately cold sensitive and extremely cold sensitive. Based on these data, we selected one day of cold stress, when maize and sorghum still exhibit comparable levels of CO 2 assimilation impairment ( Figure 2D), for downstream expression analysis.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our results (Table S4) confirm juvenile cold tolerance of sorghum being a highly quantitative trait with multiple physiological pathways involved, as already shown in previous studies [19,22,53]. Most of the QTL described in these studies lie nearby genes involved in the anthocyanin and carbohydrate metabolism.…”
Section: Genome-wide Association Studies For Juvenile Chilling Tolerancesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Several studies have aimed at the identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for a better understanding of the physiological mechanisms behind chilling tolerance related traits, either in bi-parental populations [10,16,17] or diversity sets: 194 biomass lines from KWS company (Einbeck, Germany) [7,[18][19][20]; 242 accessions of the ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) sorghum mini core collection [21]; 136 sorghum accessions from cooler regions of the world [14]; and 300 sorghum accessions from the U.S. sorghum association panel [22]. Genomic regions influencing traits of interest have been concordantly confirmed in these studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%