Coleadership Among Chief Residents: Exploration of Experiences Across Specialties

Abstract

Background Many departments have multiple chief residents. How these coleaders relate to each other could affect their performance, the residency program, and the department. Objective This article reports on how co-chiefs work together during the chief year, and what may allow them to be more effective coleaders. Methods A phenomenological research design was used to investigate experiences of outgoing chief residents from 13 specialties at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics over a 2-year period from 2012 through 2013. Thematic analysis of semistructured interviews was conducted to investigate commonalities and recommendations. Results Face-to-face interviews with 19 chief residents from 13 different specialties identified experiences that helped co-chiefs work effectively with each other in orienting new co-chiefs, setting goals and expectations, making decisions, managing interpersonal conflict, leadership styles, communicating, working with program directors, and providing evaluations and feedback. Although the interviewed chief residents received guidance on how to be an effective chief resident, none had been given advice on how to effectively work with a co-chief, and 26% (5 of 19) of the respondents reported having an ineffective working relationship with their co-chief. Conclusions Chief residents often colead in carrying out their multiple functions. To successfully function in a multichief environment, chief residents may benefit from a formal co-orientation in which they discuss goals and expectations, agree on a decision-making process, understand each other's leadership style, and receive feedback on their efficacy as leaders.

Effectiveness of a Leadership Development Course for Chief Residents: A Longitudinal Evaluation

“…In response to this need to develop leadership skills among CRs, various programs have been established in single specialties, multiple specialties, single institutions, and national programs. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Still, published evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of such programs remains sparse, with studies focusing mostly on immediate program outcomes (ie, improvement in participants' knowledge, self-awareness and self-confidence, and anticipated behavior changes 16,[21][22][23] ) and self-reported outcomes. Several systematic reviews of physician leadership development programs have shown substantial evidence gaps, especially regarding long-term measures and highimpact outcomes.…”

Characterization of Internal Medicine Chief Resident Administrative, Educational, and Clinical Experiences

“…CRs in a qualitative study across specialties identified a desire for more formal feedback. 10 These findings suggest a need for IM programs to ensure formal, structured feedback opportunities for CRs.…”

“…Some studies have looked at the leadership experience of CRs, including the unique challenges of coleadership in chief residency, as multiple people can be tasked with overlapping responsibilities. 9 , 10 , 11 The IM CR role has been described as a “middle manager” who navigates the requirements of their institutional leadership as well as relationships with the residents. 11 …”

Running a Radiology Residency Program: Strategies for Success

“…Once chief residents are selected, it is important that the program director set clear expectations for their new roles as mentors, advocates, and liaisons and that the chief residents understand each other's leadership styles to be able to successfully colead (31). The duties of the chief residents should include, but are not limited to, (a) administrative scheduling of residents, (b) scheduling morning conferences, (c) helping organize the educational program, (d) interviewing medical students apply-ing for residency positions, (e) monitoring attendance at required didactic sessions, and (f) focused tutoring of struggling residents.…”