2021
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10060657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colistin Resistance and ESBL Production in Salmonella and Escherichia coli from Pigs and Pork in the Thailand, Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Myanmar Border Area

Abstract: The study aimed to examine the prevalence and genetic characteristics of ESBL-production and colistin resistance in Salmonella and Escherichia coli from pigs and pork in the border area among Thailand, Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Myanmar. Salmonella (n = 463) and E. coli (n = 767) isolates were collected from pig rectal swab from slaughterhouses (n = 441) and pork from retail markets (n = 368) during October 2017 and March 2018. All were determined for susceptibility to colistin and cephalosporins, ESBL production … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
32
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
10
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The high proportion of colistin-resistant bacteria and the diversity of mcr variants detected here indicates a lot of independent acquisitions of mcr genes by colistin-sensitive bacteria and confirm the hypothesis that animals and food chain may play a key role in mcr transmission ( Luo et al., 2020 ). This is considering an alarming ratio since previous studies have detected colistin resistance in 37%, 40%, and 41% of bacterial isolates from pigs, poultry, and human clinical samples, respectively ( Savin et al., 2020 ; Lay et al., 2021 ; Qadi et al., 2021 ). Of note, we identified these isolates in milk samples, which included various bacterial species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The high proportion of colistin-resistant bacteria and the diversity of mcr variants detected here indicates a lot of independent acquisitions of mcr genes by colistin-sensitive bacteria and confirm the hypothesis that animals and food chain may play a key role in mcr transmission ( Luo et al., 2020 ). This is considering an alarming ratio since previous studies have detected colistin resistance in 37%, 40%, and 41% of bacterial isolates from pigs, poultry, and human clinical samples, respectively ( Savin et al., 2020 ; Lay et al., 2021 ; Qadi et al., 2021 ). Of note, we identified these isolates in milk samples, which included various bacterial species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Following the first identification of mcr -1 during nation-wide surveillance in Thailand ( 19 ), from the start of 2017 the Department of Livestock and Development (DLD) has prohibited prophylactic use of colistin sulfate in pig farms. Data regarding colistin resistance in bacteria from livestock in Thailand is still limited, although mcr positive E. coli have been detected in pig slaughterhouses from the Thailand border areas even after implementation of the colistin withdraw policy ( 20 ). Therefore, currently it is still debatable how this withdrawal of colistin usage may have influenced the emergence and spread of mcr genes in pigs and in the farm environment ( 21 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bla CTX-M-55 was also recently identified specifically in Salmonella spp. from pigs/pork in both Thailand and Lao PDR ( 24 ), while bla CTX-M-55 was identified in Escherichia coli from pig slaughterhouses/retail markets of these countries as well as from Cambodia and Myanmar. Further studies on animal food sources may define the widespread presence of CTX-M-55 in this region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%