Collaboration and partnerships: developing the evidence base

Abstract

Despite the growing literature that collaboration is a 'good' thing, there are calls emphasising the need for evidence of its effectiveness. However, the nature of the evidence to assess effectiveness is less clear. This paper examines the components that contribute to the challenges that confront evidence on collaboration. It considers the differing interpretations that have been placed on evaluation and explores how ways of determining the outcomes of collaboration and the levels of outcome measurement to assess collaborative effectiveness are influenced by the multifactorial nature of the concept. Evidence on the impact of collaboration is influenced by the diversity of perspectives and conceptual facets, and difficulty in measurement of the notions involved. Other factors discussed are the choice of macro or micro evaluation, of proximal or distal indicators, of short and long-term effects, or of individual-level or collective community-level outcomes. The suitability of randomised controlled trials for the measurement of collaborative outcomes as well as the requirement of mixed methods evaluations are highlighted. An evaluation of five community partnerships in South Africa is employed as an example to link the evaluation concepts that are discussed to a real enquiry. If collaboration is to be successful in making a difference in the lives of people, then increasing the precision and context of appraising its effectiveness will reduce the nature of inconclusive evidence and is likely to improve the practice of partnerships, coalitions and joint working in health and social care.

Evaluation of Partnership Working in Cities in Phase IV of the WHO Healthy Cities Network

“…Though assessment of the scope and effectiveness of partnerships is notoriously difficult, 17 this pragmatic evaluation rests on a number of assumptions made by WHO and supported by the evidence and conceptual propositions summarised in the Introduction. First, population health is improved by the interventions of many sectors.…”

“…El Ansari et al 17 as well as Jones and Barry 10 list the following aspects as being critical for successful health promotion (and, by inference, Healthy City) partnerships. The rhetoric around constructive and empowered engagement of end-user communities has long been considered of more value than evidence-based.…”

Evaluating WHO Healthy Cities in Europe: Issues and Perspectives

“…This assumption is grounded in an emerging theoretical and conceptual-hybrid-framework that stipulates characteristics of successful health promotion partnerships. 23,24 The subsequent methodology, though not predetermined on the basis of conscientious research considerations, has a strong flavour of a descriptive responsive realist evaluation.…”

A realistic evaluation of fines for hospital discharges: Incorporating the history of programme evaluations in the analysis

“…This situation poses several evaluation and methodological challenges. El Ansari et al (2001) explain the complexity of evaluating multi-agent programmes since 'its enquiries will exhibit similar features and will have different meanings for each and every participant group. Each constituency will want to ask different questions about whether, how and why it works' (p.223).…”