Collaboration, competition and publication in toxicology: views of British Toxicology Society members

Walker, Emma; Roberts, Ruth; Gill, Jason H.

doi:10.1039/c9tx00063a

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some of the sports coaches at organisations are lecturers, therefore, most of their time is spent in field activities such as teaching and training. Under these conditions, time limitations become part of the inhibiting factors for writing (Duracinsky et al, 2017;Habibi et al, 2019;Scherer et al, 2015;Walker, Roberts, & Gill, 2019).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A study in pre-hospital emergency care concluded that decision-makers' collaboration benefits are significant (Johnson et al, 2017). Walker et al (2019) stated that 97% of respondents agreed that collaboration is important in promoting research due to its ability to enable researchers to exchange knowledge. Therefore, government needs to promote research activities which encourage researchers to work collaboratively, both in science and other fields.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Factors Inhibiting Sports Lecturer’s Publication Productivity in International Journals

Hanief¹,

Haqiyah²,

Winarno³

et al. 2021

JL4D

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scientific publication is an essential part of research dissemination, irrespective of the productivity effects on lecturers' careers. Therefore, this study aims to determine the internal and external factors inhibiting the productivity of sports lecturers' publication in international journals. This is qualitative descriptive research with a survey method and questionnaire used to collect data from 74 sports lecturers in Indonesia by using Google form. The data were further analyzed to reduce the number of the original variables using the factor analysis method with the validity tests includes KMO (Kaiser Meyer Olkin), Bartlett, and MSA (Measure of Sampling Adequacy) used for reliability. The results showed that the sports lecturer’s writing ability and cost are responsible for inhibiting publications' productivity in international journals as opposed to gender analysis. The majority had limited time to write because most of their activities were carried out in the field. Grants offered by both the government and universities are expected to be absorbed to support the sports lecturers' publication activities in Indonesia. Further studies need to be carried out by analyzing the college type, academic position, and age as considerations for stakeholders to take strategic steps to overcome publication challenges.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Inhibiting Sports Lecturer’s Publication Productivity in International Journals

Hanief¹,

Haqiyah²,

Winarno³

et al. 2021

JL4D

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the field of artificial intelligence, the phenomenon of winner-takes-all is very common. Walker et al find that some competition is good to drive quality but can be counterproductive when competing for limited resources [45]. What is more, Brankovic et al explored the relationship between institutional ranking and competition, which shows that rankings produce or intensify competition [5].…”

Section: Q21: the Competition Among Institutions For Several Vital Re...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutional Collaboration and Competition in Artificial Intelligence

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The institutional collaboration and competition in academia have benefited the development of science, with inter-institutional scientific work promoting the exchange of ideas and competing fields developing rapidly. However, understanding of how the institutions collaborate and compete in science is sorely lacking, especially in emerging fields. Artificial intelligence is such a booming field currently, changing the way we live and work daily. To illustrate the problem, we try to reveal the evolution of institutional collaboration and competition in artificial intelligence by applying AI 2000 from the perspective of Science of Science. In this paper, we make multiple multidimensional statistical analyses by scrutinizing the collaboration network, research interests, talent flow, etc. We demonstrate the collaboration evolution in this field and find the advantage of inter-institutional collaboration is growing over time for papers that have been published more than 5 years. We discover the common cooperation modes of top institutions and visualize their closer cooperation. We highlight the critical resources competition among institutions in three dimensions and learn the recent trends in the field. In particular, we are concerned about the competition among institutions for cross-industry cooperation and notice the consistency of competitiveness and crossindustry collaboration. The research of this paper may support further research studies on institutional collaboration and competition as well as policy proposals for promoting scientific innovation, research management, and funding.

show abstract

Collaboration, competition and publication in toxicology: views of British Toxicology Society members

Abstract: BTS members offer their opinions and interesting suggestions for improvement around resourcing, collaboration, competition, infrastructure and peer review in toxicology.

Cited by 2 publications

References 10 publications

Factors Inhibiting Sports Lecturer’s Publication Productivity in International Journals

Factors Inhibiting Sports Lecturer’s Publication Productivity in International Journals

Institutional Collaboration and Competition in Artificial Intelligence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About