2008
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2008)24:4(234)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaboration Environments for Construction: Implementation Case Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, project managers must devise means of managing the collaboration to facilitate the work of distributed project team members. Erdogan et al (2008) emphasize the need for CW in construction due to the nature of projects which are multi-organizational and geographically dispersed. Integration and Collaboration overcomes the fragmentation that has come to characterize the construction process (Egan, 2002;Forbes and Ahmed, 2011).…”
Section: Construction Process Management (Cpm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, project managers must devise means of managing the collaboration to facilitate the work of distributed project team members. Erdogan et al (2008) emphasize the need for CW in construction due to the nature of projects which are multi-organizational and geographically dispersed. Integration and Collaboration overcomes the fragmentation that has come to characterize the construction process (Egan, 2002;Forbes and Ahmed, 2011).…”
Section: Construction Process Management (Cpm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development and application of IT in the AEC industry, it provides a collaborative environment (Erdogan, Anumba, Bouchlaghem & Nielsen, 2008). Especially Building Information Modeling (BIM), it provides the platform for the collaboration among the multi-disciplines and multi-stakeholders through exchanging and sharing the data (Singh, Gu & Wang, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although WPMSs offer many possibilities, implementations do not benefit from them entirely because of lack of focus on concerns related to change, implementation, human and organizational factors, and management of the end user. Therefore, many systems that are technically sound ultimately fail upon implementation (Erdogan 2008). The success of WPMS also may be hindered by the difficulty of quantifying cost and benefits of the WPMS, system reliability and security, ownership and legal issues, and Internet access .…”
Section: Theoretical Basismentioning
confidence: 99%