Collaboration on Whose Terms? Using the IAP2 Community Engagement Model for Archaeology in Kapunda, South Australia

Leiuen, Cherrie De; Arthure, Susan

doi:10.1080/20518196.2016.1154735

Cited by 18 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Then, (2) participatory methods were categorised as: questionnaires, interviews, meetings, workshops, committees and digital technologies. With regard to the (3) degrees of participation, the International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) model was used (see Table 2): i.e., inform, consult, involve, collaborate and empower (AbouAssi, Nabatchi, & Antoun, 2013;De Leiuen & Arthure, 2016). The sequence represents the extent to which community participation varies from lower to higher degrees.…”

Section: Review Focus Themesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices

Krishnamurthy

Roders

et al. 2020

Cities

130

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Community participation is an essential issue in heritage management. The international heritage organisation ICCROM published a guidance document discussing people-centred approaches to heritage management in 2015. Cultural heritage management is recommended to be carried out through a community participation process. Despite the growing literature on community participation in cultural heritage management, little research has been done on comparing Chinese to international approaches. Although in China several pilot projects have conducted effective community participation and achieved excellent outcomes. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing an overview that compares and discusses the similarities and differences between Chinese and international approaches. A systematic literature review of the state-of-the-art was conducted to explore these differences based on four themes: engaged communities, participatory methods, degrees of participation and steps taken within cultural heritage management. This review concludes both Chinese and international practices seek to collaborate with and empower local communities in their approaches, with Chinese pilot cases, such as Tianzifang in Shanghai. However, in general, Chinese cultural heritage management is government-led, in which community participation is happening to a minimal degree. China is encouraged to learn from international practices when developing contextualised management approaches, to better face the challenges of rapid urbanisation.

show abstract

Section: Review Focus Themesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices

Krishnamurthy

Roders

et al. 2020

Cities

130

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There are existing guides for supporting researchers to involve consumer co-researchers available (for example, see Alberta SPOR SUPPORT Unit, 2018b; Ball et al, 2019; Involve, n.d.; Manafò et al, 2018; NMHRC, 2018b; NMHRC, 2018a). Studies by De Leiuen and Arthure (2016) and Gunatillake et al (2020) practically demonstrate best practice techniques for involving consumers in research.…”

Section: Cpr Checklist For Market Research–integrative Literature Rev...mentioning

confidence: 96%

Consumer partnerships in research (CPR) checklist: A method for conducting market research with vulnerable consumers

Carlini

Robertson

2022

International Journal of Market Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a need for better evidence on how to effectively support consumer partnerships in research (CPR). This paper aims to provide a practical checklist for market researchers to plan, implement, and report research where vulnerable consumers are the target population. A vulnerable consumer is someone who, due to their circumstances, may be disadvantaged or at risk in some marketplace situations. Here, it is proposed that research conducted about vulnerable consumers must include consumer co-researchers as partners in the research process. The involvement of consumers as co-researchers addresses this methodological gap to some extent by democratizing research design and empowering vulnerable consumers. The CPR Checklist is based on an integrative realistic review method, content validation via an expert panel, and includes consumer co-researcher involvement in the research process. Considering the complexities of vulnerable consumers and market research, the CPR Checklist provides a suite of 'how and why' questions to guide rigorous and ethical project conduct.

show abstract

“…Over the last decade, researchers stated the indispensability of a high level of community participation within the whole process of built heritage repurposing from knowledge acquiring to negotiating needs definition or solutions sharing [40]. The dynamism and diversity of initiatives push researchers to observe best practices with the support of quantitative and qualitative analyses to understand built heritage's potential to stimulate local development and innovation [41,42]. Scientific research studies deal with the following: community identification [43]; active participatory methods analysis-to raise awareness and build capacities in local communities; and community participation approaches-to integrate cultural heritage management in sustainable urban development [44,45].…”

Section: Commonalities Between Community-led Heritage Repurposing Exp...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Built Heritage Repurposing and Communities Engagement: Symbiosis, Enabling Processes, Key Challenges

Viola

2022

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper debates the results achieved in the Sanità district of Naples within the funded research project Play_ACT by the Department of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II. The research investigates community engagement processes in built heritage design for repurposing. Based on a mixed deductive and inductive approach, this paper frames the built heritage in the following ways: (a) a record of historical development and way of life, a linking capital between community and context; (b) the enabler of community engagement, representative of creative skills and work of humankind; and (c) a driving force for growth. The paper analyses several community-driven repurposing practices experienced within European programs. Supported by the ISO 37104: 2019 and UNI 11151-1: 2005 standards, the paper focuses on the replicability of community engagement in built heritage repurposing processes, outlining the commonalities in terms of strategies, actions, and actors involved in: (1) discovery; (2) negotiation; and (3) sharing. Focusing on the Sanità district of Naples, the research experiences the sustainability of community-led repurposing, observing long-lasting spillover effects on the physical, economic, cultural, and social subsystems. Finally, with the support of a heritage case study, Cristallini 73, future key challenges for a durable and inclusive community engagement are outlined: A activation of collaborative networks; B promotion of inclusive dynamics of long-life learning; and C creation of cultural and creative industries.

show abstract

Collaboration on Whose Terms? Using the IAP2 Community Engagement Model for Archaeology in Kapunda, South Australia

Cited by 18 publications

References 26 publications

Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices

Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices

Consumer partnerships in research (CPR) checklist: A method for conducting market research with vulnerable consumers

Built Heritage Repurposing and Communities Engagement: Symbiosis, Enabling Processes, Key Challenges

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About