2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.11.152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaboration Opportunities in Advanced Housing Renovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Supply chain integration (where multiple measures and design services are provided by a single organisation) is shown as critical for the delivery of comprehensive residential retrofit, particularly for single-family houses. This supports previous literature on one-stop-shop retrofit BMs (Mahapatra et al 2013;Mlecnik et al 2012). Through this more integrated approach, performance gaps (Dowson et al 2012) and negative unintended consequences, such as mould and poor air quality, can also be minimized (Hansford 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Supply chain integration (where multiple measures and design services are provided by a single organisation) is shown as critical for the delivery of comprehensive residential retrofit, particularly for single-family houses. This supports previous literature on one-stop-shop retrofit BMs (Mahapatra et al 2013;Mlecnik et al 2012). Through this more integrated approach, performance gaps (Dowson et al 2012) and negative unintended consequences, such as mould and poor air quality, can also be minimized (Hansford 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The Energiesprong initiative radically overhauls this approach, through an integrated business model. Thus, our findings support recent research on the potential for supply chain integration (Mahapatra et al, 2013;Mlecnik et al, 2018Mlecnik et al, , 2012 and energy performance contracts for promoting whole-house retrofit (Brown, 2018;Winther and Gurigard, 2017). Therefore, these findings emphasise how the 'integrative technologies' -which characterise whole-house retrofit are best suited to hierarchical or integrated modes of governance (Hoetker, 2006;Sanchez and Mahoney, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…All groups considered introducing one main contact point as a key value proposition that might appeal to the homeowner, which might suggest the validity of the appeal of this customer value as suggested by various authors (Vanhoutteghem et al 2011;Haavik et al 2012aHaavik et al , 2012bHaavik et al , 2012cMlecnik et al 2012;Mahapatra et al 2013;Mlecnik et al 2013;Galiotto et al 2016;Grøn Bjørneboe et al 2017). However, the results also show that only a few consortia implemented this in practice.…”
Section: Target Group and Value Propositionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The engagement of intermediaries-which can include both public and private stakeholders-can also be important for facilitating individual building projects, creating niche markets, implementing new practices, supporting the creation of new business models and facilitating building use post-construction (Kivimaa and Martiskainen 2017). Various researchers (Haavik et al 2012a(Haavik et al , 2012b(Haavik et al , 2012cMlecnik et al 2012;Mahapatra et al 2013;Mlecnik et al 2013) suggest that supply-side activation should aim for innovative and cooperative business models, where various professionals collaborate to reduce fragmentation and to lessen the burden on the homeowner.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%