Collaboration strategies for publishing articles in international journals – A study of Polish scientists in economics

Łopaciuk-Gonczaryk, Beata

doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2015.07.001

Cited by 16 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…John (1987), Uzuner's (2008) review alone cites 39 research articles (henceforth: RAs) which met her criteria, which include that it must be an empirical study, meaning some other related studies are not included. After the publication of this review (2008), there have been many more studies reported focusing on different countries, for example, Mainland China (Mu, 2019), Taiwan (Chien, 2019), India (Lahiri, 2011), Iran (Maniati & Jalilifar, 2018), Poland (Lopaciuk-Gonczaryk, 2016) and Sudan (Elmalik & Nesi, 2008). Due to limited space, it is impossible to review them all.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceptions of Indonesian multilingual scholars about preparing and publishing research manuscripts in international journals

Adnan

Arsyad

Purwo

et al. 2021

SiELE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has been a great deal of interest in issues multilingual scholars (henceforth: MLS) have in trying to gain publication in international main-stream English language journals (IEJs). However, little research has been published on the experience of MLS using their perspective, particularly how they perceive their competence (knowledge and skills) to publish their research internationally. The purpose of this study was to fill this gap by investigating what they perceived as the factors that inhibited them from publishing in IEJs. This study mainly used a quantitative method, but the results were supplemented with interviews and focus group discussion with some of the participants in the survey. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) tool of the SPSS statistical programme was used to conduct two levels of analysis: the PCA and Confirmation Factorial Analysis (CFA). The key finding was that the most critical factor for the participants was not a lack of funds as widely reported in many previous studies, but lack of competence to face the challenges of preparing and publishing research article (RA) in IEJs, which had dampened self-confidence. The low self-confidence and two solutions, suggested by the participants, implicitly confirmed the key finding. The participants were aware of the various benefits of research article publication in IEJs, but they were not strong enough to overcome the critical factor. The implication is that policymakers should consider providing regular training for staff with adequate practice and feedback and introducing the subject to undergraduate or, at least, MA students before they embark on starting their research projects.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perceptions of Indonesian multilingual scholars about preparing and publishing research manuscripts in international journals

Adnan

Arsyad

Purwo

et al. 2021

SiELE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many reasons to encourage co-authorship in research works have been cited in the literature, one of the most recurrent is that unlike publishing individually, the co-authorship has a greater impact on the research in terms of the number of publications and citation (Lee and Bozeman, 2005;Ponomariov and Boardman 2010). Which is why, over time, coauthorships in all disciplines have increased (Lopaciuk 2016;De Stefano et al, 2013;Kronegger et al, 2011;Acedo et al, 2006;Laband and Tollison, 2000), and the number of coauthors per publication has also increased (Goyal et al, 2006;Wuchty et al, 2007) although the degrees and types of collaboration differ from one country to another, and from discipline to discipline. For example, Newman (2001Newman ( , 2004a when analyzing three collaborative scientific networks: Physics, Mathematics and Biology, found that theoretical investigations have, on average, fewer authors (1.99-2.22) than those from experimental areas (2.66-3.75),…”

Section: Scientific Co-authorship Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In such a way that the probability of connecting to a particular node is determined by the degree of the node to be connected, that is, a tendency of certain nodes to interact with key nodes of the network structurally positioned to benefit more than others less central (Lopaciuk-Gonczaryk, 2016;Badar et al, 2016;Bordons et al, 2015;Badar et al, 2014;Gonzalez-Brambila, 2014;Li et al, 2013;Ye et al, 2013).…”

Section: Where Its Calculated Bymentioning

confidence: 99%

Co-authorship network of national researchers of Social Sciences in Mexico

Vilchis

Moreno-Jiménez²

2020

RDLUZ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Mexico, the most outstanding researchers are distinguished by the National Council of Science and Technology. Although, in the international literature, researcher's co-authorship networks and their impact on efficacy have been studied, in Mexico this type of studies is showing a greater boom, so the objective of this paper is to analyze the structure of the network of co-authorships of the researchers in Social Sciences level 3 of the country. For this purpose, the research method was based on the theory of networks and specifically on topology metrics. One of the conclusions of the research is that the researchers under study publish in a similar proportion individually or collaboratively, configuring a fragmented co-authorship network with a main component with properties that are explained by both the small-world and the free-scale model.

show abstract

“…En México, los investigadores en cualquiera que sea su disciplina de trabajo son reconocidos por el Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI) en alguno de sus cinco niveles: candidato, nivel uno, nivel dos, nivel tres y emérito; estos últimos son de los más distinguidos por la calidad de sus publicaciones. Si bien los investigadores pueden exhibir diferentes tendencias en la colaboración, hay una creciente popularidad en publicar en coautoría independientemente de la disciplina de la que forman parte (Lopaciuk-Gonczaryk, 2016;De Stefano, Fuccella, Prosperina y Zaccarin, 2013;Kronegger, Ferligoj y Doreian, 2011), aunque en diversos grados, difiriendo de un país a otro, e incluso entre disciplinas (Liberman y Wolf, 2013;Yu Cheng, Wah Hen, Piew Tan y Fai Fok, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Red de coautoría de investigadores ambientalistas y su impacto en México

Vilchis

2019

RIDE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

En México los investigadores más destacados son distinguidos por el Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología. Aunque en la literatura internacional se han estudiado las redes de coautoría de los investigadores y el impacto de sus publicaciones, en el contexto mexicano este tipo de estudios son incipientes, por lo que el objetivo de este trabajo consistió en explorar la correlación entre dos métricas de centralidad y el índice h de los investigadores ambientalistas eméritos, niveles dos y tres del país. Para ello, el método de investigación se fundamentó en la correlación de Pearson entre las métricas de centralidad de grado y de cercanía con el índice h. Se concluye que, a pesar de que los investigadores ambientalistas publican en forma colaborativa, por lo que promedian altos valores de centralidad de grado, no existe correlación con el impacto de sus publicaciones.

show abstract

Collaboration strategies for publishing articles in international journals – A study of Polish scientists in economics

Cited by 16 publications

References 36 publications

Perceptions of Indonesian multilingual scholars about preparing and publishing research manuscripts in international journals

Perceptions of Indonesian multilingual scholars about preparing and publishing research manuscripts in international journals

Co-authorship network of national researchers of Social Sciences in Mexico

Red de coautoría de investigadores ambientalistas y su impacto en México

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About