Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1142405.1142440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative architecture design and evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The individual discipline tools differ in how the system schematic is represented, how a user chooses to visualize a system or subsystem, what an appropriate level of fidelity in a model and in the system as a whole is, what should be considered irrelevant or out of scope for the current phase of work, what information should be exchanged at the discipline boundary, etc. This insular focus tends to run counter to the goals of a collaborative design environment where collaboration is an activity requiring participation from a number of individuals in which they share ideas, resources, goals, and a common representation for the system being designed [4].…”
Section: Modeling In a Cdementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The individual discipline tools differ in how the system schematic is represented, how a user chooses to visualize a system or subsystem, what an appropriate level of fidelity in a model and in the system as a whole is, what should be considered irrelevant or out of scope for the current phase of work, what information should be exchanged at the discipline boundary, etc. This insular focus tends to run counter to the goals of a collaborative design environment where collaboration is an activity requiring participation from a number of individuals in which they share ideas, resources, goals, and a common representation for the system being designed [4].…”
Section: Modeling In a Cdementioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, it is equally important to be able to provide a shared representation of the evolving design and permit referential conversations about specific parts of the design to occur. This requires that a common representation of the system design be available for reference [4]. In S3D, the shared representation of the system under design is presented in the Naval Architecture 3D schematic tool.…”
Section: Shared and Common System Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Only relevant documents • Only unique URLs • Only unique contents • Only top ranked documents are clustered Prototype walkthrough methodology evaluates the arch itectures of extensive, comp licated, and heterogeneous system. Walkthrough supports dynamic develop ment such that the architectural demonstration can be recommended precisely during walkthroughs with the project's stakeholders [22].…”
Section: Research Prototypementioning
confidence: 99%