Collaborative Authorship in the Journal Literature: Perspectives for Academic Librarians Who Wish to Publish

Bahr, Alice Harrison; Zemon, Mickey

doi:10.5860/crl.61.5.410

Cited by 51 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…6 Besides Budd's discipline-wide study, at least nine articles since 1999 have studied publication in LIS on a smaller scale, such as one or two journals, an individual institution, or a single state. 7 Results reported in these articles provide a context for the findings of the present study. The present article discusses the relevant parts of these articles and older studies in relation to the results of the present investigation.…”

Section: May 2006mentioning

confidence: 92%

Publication Patterns of U.S. Academic Librarians from 1998 to 2002

Wiberley¹,

Hurd

Weller³

2006

CRL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examines the contributions of U.S. academic librarians to the peer-reviewed literature of library and information science (LIS). Compared to the authors’ study of thirty-two journals for 1993–1997, the present study finds that for 1998–2002, there were declines in the total number of refereed articles (almost 4%), number of refereed articles by academic librarians (almost 13%), proportion of refereed articles by academic librarians (just over 4%), proportion of academic librarian authors (almost 3%), and proportion of coauthored articles by academic librarians (almost 4%). Because different factors influence rates of authorship in a given set of journals and these rates tend to fluctuate in the short term, only further investigation can assess whether the declines are momentary or the start of a trend. Approximately 7 percent of academic librarians wrote three or more articles. The twenty most productive libraries published more than 10 percent of all refereed articles in the thirty-two journals and nearly one-third of the articles by academic librarians.

show abstract

Section: May 2006mentioning

confidence: 92%

Publication Patterns of U.S. Academic Librarians from 1998 to 2002

Wiberley¹,

Hurd

Weller³

2006

CRL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In social sciences, such as library science, collaborative writing has increased dramatically over the past 25 years (Bahr & Harrison, 2000). In other disciplines, such as the sciences and education, collaborative writing is the norm.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In other disciplines, such as the sciences and education, collaborative writing is the norm. Bahr and Harrison (2000) came to the conclusion that "... as evidenced in the sciences and social sciences, collaboration encourages author productivity and enhances article quality. As research becomes more quantitative, collaboration increases" (p. 417).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey of User-Centered System Design for Supporting Online Collaborative Writing

Handayani

2013

EduLearn

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AbstrakEssai kolaboratif (CW) adalah satu cabang kajian baru dalam khasanah ilmu pendidikan yang harus dikaji secara interdisiplin. Banyak program yang dapat digunakan untuk menunjang dan menciptakan iklim kolaboratif dalam menyelesaikan essai sebagai tugas kelompok. Makalah ini akan membahas secara singkat software yang berbasis pada Desain Sistem yang Berpusat pada Penguna (UCSD). Makalah ini juga akan menguraikan secara singkat hal-hal yang harus dipenuhi oleh UCSD agar dapat menunjang essai kolaboratif dengan baik berdasarkan pada analisa taksonomi essai kolaboratif dan kesulitan-kesulitan yang mungkin terjadi dalam menyelesaikan essai secara kolaboratif. Bagian akhir dari makalah ini akan mengulas dan membandingkan beberapa software yang didesain untuk menunjang essai kolaboratif berdasarkan pada kelengkapan desain sistem yang diusulkan oleh penulis. Kata kunci: essai kolaboratif, taksonomi essai kolaboratif, masalah dalam essai kolaboratif, desain sistem yang berpusat pada pengguna AbstractCollaborative Writing (CW) is a new emerging issue in education that must be addressed interdisciplinary. Nowadays there is lot software that can be used to support and enhance the collaboration in group writing. This paper presents the discussion about the recent user center system design for supporting collaborative writing. Based on the taxonomy and collaborative writing and the problems appear in collaborative writing, we will proposed the required design of the User-Centered System Design (UCSD) for CW software. The last part of this paper will be dedicated to examine the recent available CW soft wares based on the required designed proposed.

show abstract

“…The first a ributes the growth in collaboration to the increase in female authors. 25 Alice Harrison Bahr and Mickey Zemon (2000) suggested that "women are more likely to collaborate than men." 26 As the number of women presenters increased, one would expect an increase in the overall collaboration rate-as has happened.…”

Section: Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…25 Alice Harrison Bahr and Mickey Zemon (2000) suggested that "women are more likely to collaborate than men." 26 As the number of women presenters increased, one would expect an increase in the overall collaboration rate-as has happened. However, when the collaboration rate for men and women are compared the differences are small.…”

Section: Collaborationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The ACRL Conferences: A Profile of its Presenters

Fennewald

2007

CRL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study provides a profile of the authors of contributed papers at the first twelve ACRL conferences. It found that the conference presenters tend to be female academic librarians (administrators, reference librarians, and subject specialists) from Doctoral Research institutions in the Midwest. It also discovered several trends. During its 27-year history, there have been increases in the number of female authors, library school faculty giving papers, and authors from master's and baccalaureate institutions. In addition, the rate of collaboration has grown.The profile and its related trends were very similar to what has been reported in C&RL authorship studies-with one exception. Women are more likely to appear as conference presenters than journal authors. Further research should explore the role of gender in scholarly communication.

show abstract

Collaborative Authorship in the Journal Literature: Perspectives for Academic Librarians Who Wish to Publish

Cited by 51 publications

References 25 publications

Publication Patterns of U.S. Academic Librarians from 1998 to 2002

Publication Patterns of U.S. Academic Librarians from 1998 to 2002

A Survey of User-Centered System Design for Supporting Online Collaborative Writing

The ACRL Conferences: A Profile of its Presenters

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About