2022
DOI: 10.1177/19408447211068193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Collaborative Autoethnographic Writing as Communal Curative”

Abstract: This collaborative autoethnography reflects on how each author experienced COVID-19 and associated precarity. We explore the ways in which this experience relates to our identities (both particular and plural), and our positionalities in terms of privilege and marginality. As a collective of diverse collaborators, we confront dialectical questions of self and society. Our contributions reveal our advantage/disadvantage, mobility/immobility, and the borders and boundedness before/during/after COVID-19. We show … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Continuing from the wonders (Gale & Wyatt, 2017; MacLure, 2013), we created a space to write experimentally, creatively, and reflexively to collectively inquire about our identities and positionalities as Korean transnationals. The process of collaborative writing as a mode of inquiry (e.g., Alhayek et al, 2023; Jandrić et al, 2023) was not a pre-designed qualitative research per se . Instead, through monthly thematic writings and meetings for six months, we shared what we were pondering, feeling, and encountering at the temporal and spatial points of our personal and professional lives, and based on this conversation, each of the five authors suggested writing themes and prompts for everyone to write about until the next meeting.…”
Section: (Re)writing In-betweenness As New Potentials On the Pacific ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuing from the wonders (Gale & Wyatt, 2017; MacLure, 2013), we created a space to write experimentally, creatively, and reflexively to collectively inquire about our identities and positionalities as Korean transnationals. The process of collaborative writing as a mode of inquiry (e.g., Alhayek et al, 2023; Jandrić et al, 2023) was not a pre-designed qualitative research per se . Instead, through monthly thematic writings and meetings for six months, we shared what we were pondering, feeling, and encountering at the temporal and spatial points of our personal and professional lives, and based on this conversation, each of the five authors suggested writing themes and prompts for everyone to write about until the next meeting.…”
Section: (Re)writing In-betweenness As New Potentials On the Pacific ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6. See two examples that use a variation of this collaborative autoethnographic approach: Alexander et al (2023) and Alhayek et al (2022). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%