Collaborative care in eating disorders treatment: exploring the role of clinician distress, self-compassion, and compassion for others

Abstract

Background Collaborative care is described as showing curiosity and concern for patient experiences, providing choices, and supporting patient autonomy. In contrast, in directive care, the clinician has authority and the patient is expected to adhere to a treatment plan over which they have limited influence. In the treatment of eating disorders, collaborative care has been shown to be more acceptable and produce better outcomes than directive care. Despite widespread patient and clinician preference for collaborative care, it is common for clinicians to be directive in practice, resulting in negative patient attitudes toward treatment and poor adherence. There is a need to understand factors which contribute to its use. Purpose This study examined the contribution of clinicians' experience of distress and how they relate to themselves and others in times of difficulty (self-compassion and compassion for others), to their use of collaborative support. Method Clinicians working with individuals with eating disorders from diverse professional backgrounds (N = 123) completed an online survey. Results Whereas clinician distress was not associated with use of collaborative or directive support behaviours, self-compassion and compassion for others were. Regression analyses indicated that compassion for others was the most important determinant of collaborative care. Discussion Relating to their own and others’ distress with compassion was most important in determining clinicians’ use of collaborative support. Understanding how to cultivate conditions that foster compassion in clinical environments could promote the delivery of collaborative care.

Clinical care for severe and persistent eating disorders in pediatric populations: Perspectives of health professionals

“…Supporting clinicians to navigate ethical considerations in the unique context of pediatric care, where relational autonomy is distinctly explicit can alleviate the moral distress that arises with these complex clinical presentations. Similarly, collaborative care, and fostering compassion for others in clinicians in the context of severe and enduring presentations can also be helpful to clinicians [ 23 ].…”

The imperative of collaboration: Lived experience perspectives on team approaches in outpatient eating disorder treatment

“…Findings regarding the benefits of autonomy and limit‐setting in eating disorder treatment are consistent with previous research. Autonomy in eating disorder treatment has been linked to higher motivation for change, greater treatment satisfaction and adherence, decreased eating disorder symptoms, and improved treatment outcomes (Geller et al, 2023; Steiger et al, 2017). Similarly, the benefits of treatment non‐negotiables, including the importance of clear and justifiable reasoning, consistency, perceived fairness, and choice, are well‐established (Geller et al, 2021).…”