2017
DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2017.1280819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative Crisis Management and Leadership in the Public Sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
72
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
72
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, people and organization-oriented leadership behaviors are not also low on the effectiveness. The authors conclude that although their research highlights task-oriented leadership, but focusing on this leadership alone will not increase the efficiency of the crisis management [40].…”
Section: Decision-making In Crisis and Leadership In Crisismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…At the same time, people and organization-oriented leadership behaviors are not also low on the effectiveness. The authors conclude that although their research highlights task-oriented leadership, but focusing on this leadership alone will not increase the efficiency of the crisis management [40].…”
Section: Decision-making In Crisis and Leadership In Crisismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The literature on e-leadership particularly often focuses on personal traits and social skills, such as vigilance, responsiveness, willingness to learn and re-learn, honesty, sociability, a sense of adventure, vision, altruism, interaction, and trust-building, the so-called e-leaders have to possess (Annunzio, 2001; Savolaine, 2013). These leader characteristics are closely related to those which are needed to successfully manage any crisis: scanning the environment, strategic planning, decisiveness, problem solving, decision making, informing, managing innovation and creativity, planning and organizing personnel, motivating, managing teams and team building, networking and partnering, flexibility (Kapucu and Ustun, 2018). Moreover, previous research cases reveal that employees want to believe that, in spite of their distant location, they are important for the organization and expect the e-leader to be reachable (a 24/7 orientation) (Savolaine, 2013; DasGupta, 2011).…”
Section: Previous Research On E-leadership In General and In The Publmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, e-leadership deals with isolation and confusion (DasGupta, 2011) of team members, as caused by the physical, social, and interpersonal distance (Morrison-Smith and Ruiz, 2020; Montgomery, Roman and Pierce, 2016). E-leaders in public administration are expected to work openly, inspire individuals and teams to mobilize, concentrate on problems and results, guide rather than control, and concentrate on motivating rather than directing (Kapucu and Ustun, 2018). Whereas supervisors are expected to possess a broad range of competencies and skills, the development of competencies, in the usual case, depends on the organizational policy.…”
Section: Previous Research On E-leadership In General and In The Publmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, IS development and support may work as an enabler of the most important potential opportunities associated with the collaborations: collective action, collaborative problemsolving and increasing emergency response capacity through the joint pooling of existing and new resources and the sharing of equipment and alarm centres to improve response time and reduce costs. Similar recent perceived benefits and potential have been the focus of crosssector collaborations discussed under the term 'collaborative emergency management' (Kapucu and Ustun, 2017). However, the ability of intergovernmental and interorganisational relations and the involvement of non-governmental actors to increase the capacity of communities have been discussed mainly in relation to disasters and large-scale incidents (Nohrstedt et al, 2018;Kapucu and Demiroz, 2017;Nguyen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Is Development For Ers Cross-sector Collaborationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, the domain is no longer as unexplored as it was in 2012 and there exists related recent research under different terms, such as 'collaborative emergency management', 'public-private partnerships', 'new public sector', etc. (Nohrstedt et al, 2018;Nguyen et al, 2017;Kapucu and Ustun, 2017). However, when it comes to ERS, large-scale incidents still seem to be the main context studied, and it also seems that IS development and the related challenges are still not the main focus.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%