2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative EDNAP exercise on the IrisPlex system for DNA-based prediction of human eye colour

Abstract: The IrisPlex system is a DNA-based test system for the prediction of human eye colour from biological samples and consists of a single forensically validated multiplex genotyping assay together with a statistical prediction model that is based on genotypes and phenotypes from thousands of individuals. IrisPlex predicts blue and brown human eye colour with, on average, >94% precision accuracy using six of the currently most eye colour informative single nucleotide polymorphisms (HERC2 rs12913832, OCA2 rs1800407… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3739 Variants in SLC45A2 and SLC24A4 influence pigmentation traits including iris color. 40 The particular SNP identified in this study gives rise to a synonymous codon that is highly conserved in zebrafish and among multiple mammalian species including rhesus monkeys, chimpanzees, cattle and dogs suggesting that this gene has a critical function in mammals. The only locus in the best VEGAS pathway result was C3orf58.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…3739 Variants in SLC45A2 and SLC24A4 influence pigmentation traits including iris color. 40 The particular SNP identified in this study gives rise to a synonymous codon that is highly conserved in zebrafish and among multiple mammalian species including rhesus monkeys, chimpanzees, cattle and dogs suggesting that this gene has a critical function in mammals. The only locus in the best VEGAS pathway result was C3orf58.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…All participants achieved good quality profiles that reached the high level of genotyping concordance of 99.8% and then efficiently detected mixed sample F. In contrast, SNaPshot typing was both more challenging and for many participants less reliable, despite most laboratories having successfully genotyped six SNPs for the preceding IrisPlex EDNAP exercise [21]. Miscalled genotypes with SNaPshot produced an overall genotyping concordance rate of 97.3% when a single participant's results were excluded (13/14 laboratories).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as the 15 European laboratories including USC, two participants were from Australia, one from New Zealand and one from the USA. All but three laboratories had participated in the preceding EDNAP IrisPlex exercise that applied SNaPshot analysis to the genotyping of six FDP SNPs [21]. Five EDNAP laboratories, were part of the EUROFORGEN-NoE pilot ancestry exercise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last 10 years, candidate gene association studies and genome-wide association studies (GWASs), as well as subsequent prediction analyses, have established various EVC-predictive SNPs and prediction models, most notably for human pigmentation traits . In particular, the prediction of broad (i.e., categorical) eye and hair colour phenotypes from SNP genotypes is now achievable with practically useful accuracies, for instance by applying the IrisPlex and HIrisPlex DNA test systems that have been forensically validated [31][32][33][34], as well as tested and applied [35,36]. Similar tools for eye and hair colour DNA prediction that largely overlap in SNP predictors with the Iris/HIrisPlex systems have also been generated and used [21,[37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the predictability of skin colour from DNA [37][38][39] lagged behind that of eye and hair colour [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Valenzuela et al [21] obtained a low R 2 value for skin reflectance of 45.7% based on three SNPs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%