Collaborative innovation in tourism and hospitality: a systematic review of the literature

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to provide a synthesis of the state of research on collaborative innovation in tourism and hospitality. It presents a systematic review of the academic literature, and provides insights into the specific issues addressed by studies in this area. Design/methodology/approach A search of major research databases with multiple keywords was performed to identify relevant articles up to 2017. A total of 79 articles were identified and analyzed according to the following criteria: location of the study, perspective of analysis, methodology, level of analysis and specific themes addressed. Findings Based on a qualitative thematic analysis, five groups of articles were identified: cooperative behavior of innovating firms, co-creation, collaborative networks for innovation, knowledge transfer and innovation policies. Research limitations/implications This study contributes to making the current body of knowledge on collaborative innovation in tourism and hospitality more organized. The analysis of the different issues addressed by the literature could build the foundation for future research. Originality/value This study presents a comprehensive review of literature on collaborative innovation in tourism and hospitality. It can serve as a roadmap of literature for both academicians and practitioners, and help stimulate further interest.

A Systematic Review of Research on Sustainability in Mergers and Acquisitions

“…In order to do so, it will be applied a bibliometric methodological approach following other relevant works, e.g., [7][8][9]. After an exhaustive literature review, we can confirm that there is no article applying this methodology in the field of M&A and sustainable practices.…”

Reservation Forecasting Models for Hospitality SMEs with a View to Enhance Their Economic Sustainability

“…. ), future research could focus on the impact of collaborative networks and public-private coordination in promoting off-season visits and possible season extensions [1,32].…”

Capacity-, system- and mission-oriented innovation policies in tourism – characteristics, measurement and prospects

“…Although we are gradually learning more about the intrinsic details of fascinating innovations in tourism, and although there is significant publicity around managers and destinations who successfully launch processes and products, there is still a void in the accurate understanding of the driving forces of tourism innovations and how to affect them through policy. Public innovation policies might either impinge on or stimulate the renewal of the tourism sector, but much still needs to be scrutinized in terms of why, what, how and with what effects (Hall, 2009;Hjalager, 2010;Marasco et al, 2018;Mei, Arcodia, & Ruhanen, 2012;Rodriguez, Williams, & Hall, 2014).…”

“…There is a relentless appeal for enterprises, organizations and destinations in tourism to be innovative, for example to deliver new experiences and comforts, to improve performance and efficiency, to take advantage of digitalization, to manage the millennials with new incentives, to involve tourists in co-production, etc. However, systematic surveys still show that tourism is below average in terms of its propensity to innovate (Camisón & Monfort-Mir, 2012;Divisekera & Nguyen, 2018;Pikkemaat & Zehrer, 2016), and innovation in conglomerates of tourism actors such as destinations is also criticized for being slow and unoriginal (Marasco, De Martino, Magnotti, & Morvillo, 2018;Novelli, B. Schmitz, T. Spencer, 2006;Zach & Hill, 2017).…”