Collaborative learning in small groups in an online course – a case study

Abstract

Background The ability to learn collaboratively and work in teams is an essential competency in both educational and healthcare settings, and collaborative student activities are acknowledged as being an important part of the pedagogical approach in higher education and teaching. The course that was the focus of this research, a 15-ECTS-credit online course in philosophy of science, ethics, and research methods, was offered online as part of 11 master’s-level health programmes at a university in Norway. Collaborative learning in combination with digital teaching tools was the preferred pedagogical approach in the online course. The aim of the study was to describe, explore and discuss how the students collaborated in small groups in an online course to learn. Methods We performed six focus groups and 13 individual interviews from February 2018 to May 2019, conducting a qualitative case study with a content analysis of the data collected. The participants were master students in the same faculty at a university in Norway. All the included participants had fulfilled the 15 ECTS credit course. Results Our study revealed that the collaboration in small groups resulted in three different working processes, depending on the students’ ability to be flexible and take responsibility for their own and common learning. The three different working processes that emerged from our data were 1. joint responsibility – flexible organization; 2. individual responsibility – flexible organization; and 3. individual responsibility – unorganized. None of the groups changed their working process during their course, even though some experienced their strategy as inadequate. Conclusions Our study showed that despite similar factors such as context, assignments and student autonomy, the students chose different collaboration strategies to accomplish the online course learning objectives. Each group chose their own working process, but only the strategy 1. joint responsibility – flexible organization seemed to promote collaboration, discussion, and team work to complete the complex assignments in the online course. The result from our study may be helpful in designing and planning future online courses; hence online learning requires a focus on how students collaborate and learn online, to gain knowledge and understanding through group discussion.

The Effect of the Integration of Metacognitive and Motivation Scaffolding Through a Pedagogical Agent on Self- and Co-Regulation Learning

“…Also, as many as 86% of students stated that group learning activities with group discussions (4-5 people) were meaningful learning activities. This is in line with the study of Haugland et al [77], who found that collaborative learning in small groups can promote in-depth learning. This study also revealed that learners' obstacles in discussing were not knowing discussion partners, not knowing how to start discussions (embarrassed/confused), and not understanding how to give opinions.…”

A pedagogical approach optimization toward sustainable architectural technology education applied by massive open online courses

“…Students can also be required to turn on the camera and ask questions so teachers can better supervise their students' learning. In terms of testing the teaching effect, teachers can use the online examination function in learning tools to assess students or use group assessment to reward groups with excellent results from benign competition, strengthen the mutual assistance of students in the group, and finally promote students' autonomous learning (Jorunn et al ., 2022). Therefore, while using MOOCs' online teaching platforms, various innovative e-learning methods can be combined to compensate for the shortcomings of MOOCs and ensure effective communication between teaching and learning.…”

Remote study for the humanities and social sciences: digitization and coaching

“…The and Usagawa [22] considers the selection of services for the creation of mathematical tests, without summarizing the results obtained in other disciplines. Haugland et al explore collaborative learning in small groups in an online course in philosophy of science, ethics, and research methods [23].…”