2018
DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2018.1443058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative quality enhancement in engineering education: an overview of operational models at a programme level

Abstract: This article discusses the tension between quality assurance and quality enhancement in engineering education at programme level. It acknowledges that accreditation has evolved for many years, but does not agilely support innovation or implement changes in educational programmes. Existing quality assurance systems, institutional collaboration networks, as well as new innovative quality enhancement models and processes are described, contrasted and synthesised. Quality enhancement is analysed based on its funct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 20 ] carried out a comprehensive study to conceptualize the challenges faced by European higher education in the implementation of quality in the education sector and classified them into three categories i) quality culture and leadership challenges, ii) implementation challenges (execution, funding, and competency) and iii) organization challenges (education system, quality system, and external stakeholders). Uncut literature may not be possible to accommodate in the study; however, relevant studies are cited here [ 21 ]. Highlighted the need for innovative quality enhancement frameworks and institutional collaborative networks for quality assurance and equality enhancement in engineering education [ 22 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 20 ] carried out a comprehensive study to conceptualize the challenges faced by European higher education in the implementation of quality in the education sector and classified them into three categories i) quality culture and leadership challenges, ii) implementation challenges (execution, funding, and competency) and iii) organization challenges (education system, quality system, and external stakeholders). Uncut literature may not be possible to accommodate in the study; however, relevant studies are cited here [ 21 ]. Highlighted the need for innovative quality enhancement frameworks and institutional collaborative networks for quality assurance and equality enhancement in engineering education [ 22 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Данные характеристики приобретают особое значение в инженерной деятельности, специфика которой расширяется от применения известных технологий, нормативов и стандартов до категорий творчества в инновационных технологических решениях. Компетентностный подход в подготовке инженеров, во многом связанный с идеей большего участия представителей профессиональной сферыв реальной образовательной практике, приближающей процесс образования к ситуациям профессиональной деятельности, дал положительные результаты, тем не менее проблемная ситуация с качеством инженерного образования все еще остается [1,2].Одной из нерешенных проблем высшего образования, которая следует из предыдущей ступени образования, является качество естественнонаучной подготовленности абитуриентов, о чем свидетельствует невысокий средний балл ЕГЭ по естественнонаучным дисциплинам, достаточный для зачисления в вузы, которые реализуют программы инженерно-технических направлений. Недостаточные знания по естественнонаучным дисциплинам вызывают трудности у студентов при обучении в вузе, и эта проблема касается не только нашей страны [3].…”
unclassified