Collaborative scientific production of epilepsy in Latin America from 1989 to 2018: A bibliometric analysis

Abstract

Socioeconomic and cultural factors coupled with an inability to control many endemic and emerging diseases have resulted in a growing incidence of epilepsy cases in Latin America. This study aimed to analyze and describe scientific research output trends in epilepsy research for the period 1989-2018. Publications were extracted from Scopus indexed journals. Bibliometric analysis was used to analyze scientific output including number of annual publications, documents, and publication characteristics. A mapping analysis using VOSviewer software visualized collaborative network analysis, co-citation analysis, and keyword co-occurrence analysis. SciVal quantitatively analyzed distribution of countries, institutions, citation counts, H-index, and research collaborative partnerships. A total of 176507 records were initially retrieved after which 5636 were analyzed. Overall, an increasing trend for publication output was observed from 19 articles in 1989 to 342 in 2018; the number of publications significantly increased over the past 20 years (p ¼ 0.0065). The majority of publications were original articles (74.4%). Brazil had the most scientific production (55.2%), followed by Mexico (15.4%) and Argentina (10%). Extra-regional collaboration was primarily with the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada; intraregional collaboration was low. The most common area of investigation by co-occurrences was "diagnostic research" (37.2%), with studies based on electroencephalography and nuclear magnetic resonance. Epilepsy research in Latin America has seen a steady growth with significant increases over the past 20 years. Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina are the most productive countries in the field collaborating primarily with extraregional countries of high-income.

Global research on cysticercosis and neurocysticercosis: A bibliometric analysis

“…Scientific collaboration has emerged as a crucial mechanism for promoting research and particularly for generating synergies between countries with more and less economic development. This has also been the experience in relation to other endemic as HIV infection or emerging NTDs as Chagas disease, that are difficult to control in countries with less socioeconomic development ( 12 , 32 , 33 ). In countries with lower income levels, smaller populations, and scientific systems with less capacity, including Peru but also Ecuador, Tanzania, Kenya and Thailand, the high level of international collaboration (65% to 93% of the documents on cysticercosis and neurocysticercosis) contrasts with the lower levels observed in larger countries like Mexico, Brazil, and India (< 31%).…”

Medical Education Research Trends, 1989–2018: A Bibliometric and Social Network Analysis

“…More speci cally, Bibliometrix is a statistical package written in R, a programming language and open source software with rich statistical and visualization capabilities that enables the analysis and visualization of bibliometric data retrieved from WoSCC and Scopus 20 . Meanwhile, VOSviewer is a good tool for analysing the nuances of network data, such as co-occurrences of scienti c terms and collaborations among research institutions 21 . Last, SciMAT was developed as a powerful science mapping tool and features multiple modules that simplify analyst work ow 22 .…”

Epilepsy Care in Latin America and the Caribbean: Overcoming Challenges and Embracing Opportunities

“…Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina emerge as the leading countries in this domain, mainly engaging in collaborations with affluent countries outside the region. 80…”