2024
DOI: 10.1109/tmc.2022.3219261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative Service Placement, Task Scheduling, and Resource Allocation for Task Offloading With Edge-Cloud Cooperation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that there is just one location [23] where the tasks 𝕀 can be carried out, which can be stated as follows:…”
Section: Expositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We assume that there is just one location [23] where the tasks 𝕀 can be carried out, which can be stated as follows:…”
Section: Expositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the offloading decisions can be redefined as In this situation, when each Fog node runs independently, our primary aim is to reduce each Fog node's service delay, resulting in a reduction in overall service delay. The service type arrangement described in [13,29,23], we set the number of service types to π•Š = 8. When π•₯ = 1, the largest number of combinations possible in Eq.…”
Section: Non-cooperative Fog Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yang et al proposed the novel cloud-edge-end orchestrated computing scheme for reducing energy consumption and obtaining optimal policies by repairing missing values in [7]. In [8], Fan et al proposed the task unloading and resource scheduling plan to realize the overall task handling latency optimization in cloud-edgeend network. However, despite the rapid progress achieved by aforementioned studies, several open issues remain unaddressed, which are summarized as below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 summarizes some research with optimization objectives and scheduling approaches. βœ“ βœ“ [20] βœ“ βœ“ [23] βœ“ βœ“ [24] βœ“ βœ“ βœ“ [26] βœ“ βœ“ [27] βœ“ βœ“…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%