2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative swarm intelligence to estimate PV parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimized parameters of the DDM and TDM based on COA have been introduced in Table VI and Table VII, respectively. Table VI is also for comparing the results of the DDM-based COA with other techniques of WDOWOAPSO [56], GCPSO [63], TVACPSO [64], and ABC-DE [65]. The table validates the superiority of the applied COA algorithm with respect to the minimum value of the RMSE which equals 2.40412239424184E-3.…”
Section: B Case Study 2; Photowatt-pwp201 Modulementioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimized parameters of the DDM and TDM based on COA have been introduced in Table VI and Table VII, respectively. Table VI is also for comparing the results of the DDM-based COA with other techniques of WDOWOAPSO [56], GCPSO [63], TVACPSO [64], and ABC-DE [65]. The table validates the superiority of the applied COA algorithm with respect to the minimum value of the RMSE which equals 2.40412239424184E-3.…”
Section: B Case Study 2; Photowatt-pwp201 Modulementioning
confidence: 70%
“…Table I also includes the results of the estimated parameters based on COA and those estimated based on other optimization techniques such as ABSO [40], HS [36], PSO [25], GA [53], An.5-Pt. [54], LW [55], Newton [56], CM [57], and PS [58]. From this table, it can be noticed that for the SDM model, the application of the proposed COA algorithm results in the minimum value of the RMSE that is equal to 7.75470161606E-04.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For a single diode model, the results provided by the proposed TGA are better than that of Newton [57], PS [32], OIS [61], TSLLS [69], RF [70], and DAB [63]. The values of the PV module parameters in the DDM are more accurate than those obtained by WDOWOAPSO [64], GCPSO [65], TVACPSO [66] and ABC-DE [67] as validated by the lowest value of the RMSE.…”
Section: Parameters Of Photowatt-pwp201 Pv Modulementioning
confidence: 80%
“…Xiong et al solved the parameter extraction problem of different PV models by using several metaheuristics including symbiotic organisms search (SOS) algorithm [24], improved WOA based on two modified prey searching strategies [25], and hybrid DE with WOA [26]. In addition to the aforementioned metaheuristics, many more [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] have also been presented to solve the important problem. e abovementioned metaheuristics have, to some extent, proven themselves promising methods for the parameter extraction problem of PV models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%