Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3240167.3240211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative symptoms interpretation for cardiac patients as diagnostic agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, patients wanted to become more active in their health management and interpret data collaboratively with their health care providers. Participants were uncertain about their role in home monitoring, suggesting that more studies testing the use of real data from remote monitoring should be conducted [14]. The vision to engage patients directly with the remote monitoring process may enhance clinical and economic outcomes by helping patients take an active role in managing their health condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, patients wanted to become more active in their health management and interpret data collaboratively with their health care providers. Participants were uncertain about their role in home monitoring, suggesting that more studies testing the use of real data from remote monitoring should be conducted [14]. The vision to engage patients directly with the remote monitoring process may enhance clinical and economic outcomes by helping patients take an active role in managing their health condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fewer studies have explored how alerts can be designed and used as a collaborative mechanism in healthcare settings. One exception is research examining how physicians and patients discuss alerts when collaborating to interpret medical data [1,21,33]. Because these alerts occurred outside the clinical setting, providers communicated with patients to understand the events leading to the alert and how the patient responded [33].…”
Section: Use Of Alerts In Clinical Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%