2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11115-018-0415-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative Ties Within: Public Organizations and the Latent Capacity for Advice Network Formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the qualitative study performed by Cross (2001), the results of interviews indicated five informational benefits when one seeks advice from another: solutions to problems; meta-knowledge from an interaction that yields pointer to the individual with expertise or the location of relevant documents; problem reformulation by defining important dimensions of problem; validation of an individual's solution or plan; and legitimation as the ability to cite a respected source. These advice ties can be seen as social conduits for the circulation of information and knowledge freely (Bland & Williams 2019). Moreover, when an individual provides advice, (s)he is able to process complex problems raised by advice seekers and can absorb and process the information for producing diverse ideas and solutions as alternatives in another situation (Hu et al 2018).…”
Section: Friendship and Advice Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the qualitative study performed by Cross (2001), the results of interviews indicated five informational benefits when one seeks advice from another: solutions to problems; meta-knowledge from an interaction that yields pointer to the individual with expertise or the location of relevant documents; problem reformulation by defining important dimensions of problem; validation of an individual's solution or plan; and legitimation as the ability to cite a respected source. These advice ties can be seen as social conduits for the circulation of information and knowledge freely (Bland & Williams 2019). Moreover, when an individual provides advice, (s)he is able to process complex problems raised by advice seekers and can absorb and process the information for producing diverse ideas and solutions as alternatives in another situation (Hu et al 2018).…”
Section: Friendship and Advice Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of this approach, they focus almost exclusively on the characteristics of formed advice ties. They only capture those individuals who have made it past Steps 1 and 2 in the process (Bland & Williams, 2018). Thus, we hope to shift some much-needed attention to Step 1 in this process and investigate the relationship between an employee’s perception of voice and his or her propensity to cross certain intraorganizational boundaries to share advice.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When I refer to situational trust in whisper networks, the sender and receiver need a complex understanding of "codes" built through a lifetime of common experiences around gender, sex, race, and other multifaceted marginalizations. Network formation happens through both formal and informal structures (Bland & Williams, 2019;Kilduff & Brass, 2010;Krackhardt & Kilduff, 1990).…”
Section: Trust Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Communication is a key factor in how people decide to network when they are left to their own devices. Successful network formation is more likely with people who have collaborative and egalitarian personality traits (Bland & Williams, 2019). To further address the formation of whisper networks, I will use guiding questions such as: what gives people the ability to be part of a whisper network?…”
Section: Trust Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%