2018
DOI: 10.1109/tcsvt.2016.2631404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collaborative Visual Cryptography Schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the scheme in [33] can realize a non-expanded CBW-VCS, it still needs codebook design. Moreover, other related schemes [15,24,25] utilize integer linear programming (ILP) to construct VCSs with a small pixel expansion, whereas their ultimate goal is still to design codebooks and the design process is slightly complicated. In addition, the schemes in [25,29] are suitable for general access structures.…”
Section: Feature Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the scheme in [33] can realize a non-expanded CBW-VCS, it still needs codebook design. Moreover, other related schemes [15,24,25] utilize integer linear programming (ILP) to construct VCSs with a small pixel expansion, whereas their ultimate goal is still to design codebooks and the design process is slightly complicated. In addition, the schemes in [25,29] are suitable for general access structures.…”
Section: Feature Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…deterministic visual cryptography that deterministic and random grid visual cryptography are strictly related. Xingxing Jia et al [5] designed A (k, n)-conventional visual cryptography (VC) method to share one secret and each participant takes one share. Collaborative visual cryptography (CVC) schemes into the multiple secrets VC scheme with a general access structure.…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [15] developed collaborative visual cryptography scheme. It is used to embed multiple secrets for general access structure.…”
Section: Fig1 Example: Block Of Pixels Substituted For Single Pixelmentioning
confidence: 99%