Collaboratively organized stancetaking in Japanese: Sharing and negotiating stance within the turn constructional unit

Iwasaki, Shimako

doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.04.007

Cited by 9 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…9) to the chest to point to herself in line 14 to ask if it is ok for her to take turn (Mondada, 2007). That is, she finds herself in the same situation as in line 10, and takes action to solicit her turn (Iwasaki, 2015) by way of multimodality. Furthermore, overlaps in lines 6 to 9 demonstrate the interaction carries on smoothly.…”

Section: Figure 10mentioning

confidence: 99%

Multimodality as an Interactional Resource for Classroom Interactional Competence (CIC)

Park¹

2017

Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper of action research discusses the emergent progress of multimodality in the classroom interaction. Despite the pivotal role of multimodality in interaction in the foreign language classroom, little attention has been paid to how embodied behaviours are used as a resource by students in relation to Classroom Interactional Competence (CIC). The study, therefore, aims to assess how multimodality influences learning from learner's perspectives. The data for this study is based on the video-recording of an English grammar lesson for adult learners. Drawing on a Conversation Analysis (CA) approach to look into the interactional unfolding of multimodal behaviours, this study uncovered the potential impact of multimodality on interaction in a foreign language classroom. The findings have significant implications for research on CIC and language teacher education.

show abstract

Section: Figure 10mentioning

confidence: 99%

Multimodality as an Interactional Resource for Classroom Interactional Competence (CIC)

Park¹

2017

Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…4 Our notion of affiliation builds on the notion of 'stance' . Stancetaking has been described by many as being fundamental to human interaction (Du Bois 2007;Du Bois and Kärkkäinen 2012;Englebretson 2007;Goodwin 2007;Goodwin and Goodwin 1992;Iwasaki 2015;Ochs 1996), yet the concept is sometimes used in subtly different (and thus, potentially confusing) ways. Ochs (1996, 410), for instance, defines affective stance as "a mood, attitude, feeling and disposition, as well as degrees of emotional intensity vis-à-vis some focus of concern".…”

Section: Affiliation Agreement and Alignmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We argue, however, that an affective stance is not a putative psychological state, but an action by which an interactant displays a particular attitude or feeling. As opposed to treating stance as being a 'mood' or a 'feeling' , we treat stancetaking as something that can occur only through the back-and-forth of social interaction (Iwasaki 2015;Stivers 2008). It is worth briefly noting that stances themselves may vary in their degree of explicitness.…”

Section: Affiliation Agreement and Alignmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modulating troubles affiliating in initial interactions

Flint¹,

Haugh

Merrison

2019

PRAG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Much of the research on affiliation to date has focused on how people do (dis)affiliation. This paper explores the remedial work that follows instances of disaffiliation between interactants who are getting acquainted. Building on an interactional pragmatics analytical approach informed by methods and research in conversation analysis, findings indicate that extended remedial accounts recurrently follow moments of disaffiliation in initial interactions. These remedial accounts enable participants to reposition a prior disaffiliative stance as (ostensibly) affiliative. It appears in initial interactions, then, that remedial accounts play an important role in modulating troubles in affiliating. We propose that the considerable interactional work undertaken by these participants to modulate such troubles reflects a general preference for agreeability in initial interactions, at least amongst (Australian and British) speakers of English.

show abstract

“…Building upon this work is research showing that complex spates of embodied conduct can support the production of turn constructional units in talk (Goodwin, 1980;Streeck & Hartge, 1992;Schegloff, 1984;Kendon, 2004;Mondada, 2007b;. For example, turn constructional units can be initiated (Deppermann, 2013b), completed (Keevallik, 2014;Klippi, 2005;Olsher, 2004), and suspended (Iwasaki, 2015) through embodied resources. Such research has highlighted how embodied resources can contribute to the accomplishment of predominately verbal turn constructional units (Keevallik, 2018).…”

Section: Chapter 3: Pain Displays As Units Of Actionmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…Other work has shown that a turn constructional unit can be delayed. Iwasaki (2015) demonstrated that when shifting from an aligning to disaligning stance, the final negative element of a turn constructional unit can be delayed using multimodal resources like talk, gaze, and facial expression.…”

Section: Embodied Turns?mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Interactional Organisation Of Pain Displays In Medical Consultations

La¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p>Pain is commonly understood as a private experience situated within the individual. However, pain also takes place in the social world, emerging as an interactional event between individuals. The current thesis examined pain displays in interaction and showed how they are sensitive to, and shaped by, the immediate social environment. Discursive psychology and conversation analysis were used as theoretical and methodological frameworks to investigate pain displays as social actions. The empirical data of the study were video recordings of medical consultations between general practitioners and patients. Pain displays within physical examinations were analysed as complex multimodal Gestalts following Mondada (2014b); these are locally constituted from a web of embodied and vocal resources. The first analytic chapter focused on pain displays and the organisation of turns. Participants oriented to pain displays as structural units with an onset, peak, and projectable completion place that organised when and how they built their turns-at-talk. Pain displays were also visible in the progressivity of turns-at-talk, emerging at transition relevant places, suspended and re-initiated with respect to speaker turns. The second analytic chapter showed that pain displays were sequentially organised. Pain displays were oriented to as responsive actions that progressed pain solicitations. However, they did not lead to activity closure, raising questions about the status of pain displays as conditionally relevant next actions. The thesis demonstrated the orderly ways pain displays were coordinated with, and contributed to, the diagnostic work of the ongoing medical interaction. Pain displays were found to be inextricably tied to the interactional environment, a finding supported by other research which has shown internal states like pain and emotion are produced as socially-organised practices. Finally, the thesis contributes to debates within multimodal research, providing support for the utility of talk-focused conversation analytic concepts to describe embodied action. The findings also have practical applications for people seeking medical help for pain.</p>

show abstract

Collaboratively organized stancetaking in Japanese: Sharing and negotiating stance within the turn constructional unit

Cited by 9 publications

References 25 publications

Multimodality as an Interactional Resource for Classroom Interactional Competence (CIC)

Multimodality as an Interactional Resource for Classroom Interactional Competence (CIC)

Modulating troubles affiliating in initial interactions

The Interactional Organisation Of Pain Displays In Medical Consultations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About