1997
DOI: 10.3109/03008209709160226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collagen Fibril Diameters in the Rabbit Medial Collateral Ligament Scar

Abstract: Previous transmission electron microscopic investigations of collagen fibril diameters in rabbit medial collateral ligament (MCL) scars have indicated a homogeneous population of small fibrils for the first 40 weeks of healing. In this study, four 8 mm MCL gap scars were studied at 78 weeks of healing and another three at 104 weeks. Results showed increased heterogeneity in the distribution of fibril diameters in all scars, with the appearance of progressively slightly larger fibrils in 78 and 104 week specime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
68
1
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
68
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the identifiable differences between remodeled matrix and normal ligament matrix include alterations to proteoglycans and types of collagen, failure of collagen crosslinks to mature, persistence of small collagen fibril diameters, altered cell connections, increased vascularity, abnormal innervations, increased cellularity and the incomplete resolution of matrix flaws [1,28,49,[50][51][52][53][54]. Although research suggests that persisting collagen abnormalities may be the most critical aspect of regaining ligament tissue function, virtually all other tissue components are likely to play equally important roles in tissue function, either directly or indirectly [46,49,[55][56][57].…”
Section: Ligament Response To Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some of the identifiable differences between remodeled matrix and normal ligament matrix include alterations to proteoglycans and types of collagen, failure of collagen crosslinks to mature, persistence of small collagen fibril diameters, altered cell connections, increased vascularity, abnormal innervations, increased cellularity and the incomplete resolution of matrix flaws [1,28,49,[50][51][52][53][54]. Although research suggests that persisting collagen abnormalities may be the most critical aspect of regaining ligament tissue function, virtually all other tissue components are likely to play equally important roles in tissue function, either directly or indirectly [46,49,[55][56][57].…”
Section: Ligament Response To Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, after injury, fibroblasts primarily synthesize type III collagen, not type I collagen, which it produces to a much smaller degree [60,61]. The abnormal cross-linking of collagen and the smaller diameters in collagen fibrils in repaired ligament tissue cause weakness in both tissue strength and tissue stiffness, often remaining for months or years after initial injury [46,49,50,52,56,62,63]. In addition, evidence suggests that remodeled collagen fibrils are not packed as densely as in normal ligaments, and the remodeled tissue appears to contain materials other than collagen, such as blood vessels, fat cells, and inflammatory cell pockets, all of which contribute to its weakness [1,46,49].…”
Section: Remodeled Ligaments -Not Nearly As Good As Newmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the late 1970s, studies have been done to investigate the ultrastructural morphology of collagen fibrils with electron microscopy and image analysis techniques [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Reports on the correlation between biomechanical strength and fibril size of connective tissues are equivocal [14,16,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associated with abnormal biomechanical properties, there were increases in the ratio of type III and V collagen over type I collagen and a decrease of hydroxypyrimidinium crosslinks (Kavalkovich et al, 1997). Furthermore, the collagen fibril diameter, when examined under transmission electron microscopy, remained smaller than normal up to 2 years after injury (Frank et al, 1997). As a result, much effort has been made to enhance the properties of the healing ligament.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%