2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018gl077649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collapse and Earthquake Swarm After North Korea's 3 September 2017 Nuclear Test

Abstract: North Korea's 3 September 2017 nuclear test was followed by several small seismic events, with one eight-and-a-half minutes after the test and three on and after 23 September 2017. Seismic analysis reveals that the first event is a near vertical on-site collapse toward the nuclear test center from 440 ± 260 m northwest of the test site, with its seismic source best represented by a single force with a dip angle of 70°-75°and an azimuth of~150°, and the later events are an earthquake swarm located 8.4 ± 1.7 km … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The divergent horizontal motions and the moment tensor of the first event consistently suggest a predominant isotropic explosive source buried at shallow depth. The moment of the geodesy-derived models, assuming an empirical rigidity of 5.7 GPa (36), is M w = 5.5, larger than the one inferred seismically (M w = 5.24), because it includes slow deformation that did not generate seismic waves, with a total volume change of 0.01 km 3 . The seismic analysis of the second event reveals an implosive seismic source that occurred south of the first event with a dominant negative isotropic component, suggesting an inverse process of the main explosion.…”
Section: Research | Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The divergent horizontal motions and the moment tensor of the first event consistently suggest a predominant isotropic explosive source buried at shallow depth. The moment of the geodesy-derived models, assuming an empirical rigidity of 5.7 GPa (36), is M w = 5.5, larger than the one inferred seismically (M w = 5.24), because it includes slow deformation that did not generate seismic waves, with a total volume change of 0.01 km 3 . The seismic analysis of the second event reveals an implosive seismic source that occurred south of the first event with a dominant negative isotropic component, suggesting an inverse process of the main explosion.…”
Section: Research | Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These nuclear tests have led to the question of whether the dynamic stress changes are large enough to disturb the magma chambers beneath the volcano and therefore accelerate the volcanic activity (Hong et al, ) or trigger microseismicity around the volcano (Liu, Li, Peng, et al, ). A recent study by Tian et al () reported that the North Korea's 3 September 2017 nuclear test has triggered an earthquake swarm with a maximum magnitude of 3.6 located ~8.4 km to the north of the test site.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inverted vertical source location of the 6th UNE is 597 m above the sea level, which corresponds to 1611 m below the surface considering the topography of the source region 21 . The inverted detonation depth of the 6th UNE is close to the elevation of tunnel entrance (~1400 m above the sea level and ~760 m below the surface), supporting the depth accuracy of the hypocenter-inversion method 10 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%