2002
DOI: 10.1038/nature00968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collapse and revival of the matter wave field of a Bose–Einstein condensate

Abstract: While the matter wave field of a Bose-Einstein condensate is usually assumed to be intrinsically stable, apart from incoherent loss processes, it has been pointed out that this should not be true when a Bose-Einstein condensate is in a coherent superposition of different atom number states [1][2][3][4][5][6] . This is the case for example whenever a Bose-Einstein condensate is split into two parts, such that a well-defined relative phase between the two matter wave fields is established. When these two condens… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

49
1,505
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,204 publications
(1,560 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
49
1,505
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For large U the behavior is different, showing strong so-called collapse-and-revival oscillations with approximate frequency 2π/U . They stem from the vicinity of the atomic limit (i.e., zero hopping amplitude), for which the propagator e −iHt is exactly periodic with period 2π/U [173]. For finite hopping (small compared to U ) these oscillations are damped and decay on timescales of order /bandwidth.…”
Section: Dmft For Nonequilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For large U the behavior is different, showing strong so-called collapse-and-revival oscillations with approximate frequency 2π/U . They stem from the vicinity of the atomic limit (i.e., zero hopping amplitude), for which the propagator e −iHt is exactly periodic with period 2π/U [173]. For finite hopping (small compared to U ) these oscillations are damped and decay on timescales of order /bandwidth.…”
Section: Dmft For Nonequilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, at the lowest order ω (1) (µ 1 , µ 2 ) and ω ′ (1) (µ 1 , µ 2 ) have the same form in terms of the generating function Ω Ψ0 as for m z = 0. The only difference is in ϕ(µ), which is now different from zero ϕ (1) (µ) = tanh(ζ/2)[d * ρ (1) 0 ](−iµ) . (8.4) …”
Section: Initial States With Nonzero Longitudinal Magnetizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonequilibrium dynamics in closed quantum systems, and in particular quantum quenches, have attracted much experimental [1][2][3][4][5][6] and theoretical attention in recent years. There is a growing consensus that integrable models exhibit important differences in behaviour as compared to non-integrable ones 41 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of thermalization to a Gibbs ensemble becomes apparent within this approach. Motivated by recent experimental advances in the field of cold atoms, the theoretical study of the non-equilibrium dynamics of isolated interacting many-body quantum systems is currently receiving increasing attention [1][2][3][4]. Among the several questions that have been addressed, a central one concerns the way in which a macroscopically large isolated system evolving with unitary quantum dynamics from a generic initial state approaches equilibrium.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%