1995
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<1075:cosnaa>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collapse of southwestern North America and the evolution of early Miocene detachment faults, metamorphic core complexes, the Sierra Nevada orocline, and the San Andreas fault system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Balancing the complex gaps and overlaps that would result from removing the slip on these faults is beyond the scope of this study. For similar reasons, we did not correct for inferred rotations in the eastern Transverse Ranges or southern Sierra Nevada and Mojave Desert (Kanter and McWilliams, 1982;Luyendyk et al, 1985;Dokka and Ross, 1995). Nor did we take into account middle to late Tertiary extension, which affected the region from Death Valley southeastward to the corridor of the lower Colorado River (e.g., Davis and Coney, 1979), despite the fact that extension has greatly altered the surface geology compared to Late Cretaceous-early Tertiary time.…”
Section: Appendix 1: Palinspastic Restoration Of Southwest North Americamentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Balancing the complex gaps and overlaps that would result from removing the slip on these faults is beyond the scope of this study. For similar reasons, we did not correct for inferred rotations in the eastern Transverse Ranges or southern Sierra Nevada and Mojave Desert (Kanter and McWilliams, 1982;Luyendyk et al, 1985;Dokka and Ross, 1995). Nor did we take into account middle to late Tertiary extension, which affected the region from Death Valley southeastward to the corridor of the lower Colorado River (e.g., Davis and Coney, 1979), despite the fact that extension has greatly altered the surface geology compared to Late Cretaceous-early Tertiary time.…”
Section: Appendix 1: Palinspastic Restoration Of Southwest North Americamentioning
confidence: 87%
“…One major difference between the Late Cretaceous-Paleocene detachment faulting event proposed in this paper and early Miocene extension in the region, however, is the direction of extension. The early Miocene regional extension is NEdirected, whereas the inferred Late Cretaceous extension directions range mostly from NW to NNW Even if the early Miocene extension direction originally was to the north, as pro posed by Dokka (1989) and Dokka and Ross (1995), it still would not coincide with the Cretaceous direction regardless of whether the Cretaceous direction was subsequently rotated in the Miocene.…”
Section: Miocene Extension Versus Late Cretaceouspaleocene Extensionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…1) and other faults in the area (Dokka, 1989;Glazner et al, 1989;Walker et al, 1990;Fletcher et al, 1995). Dokka (1989) and Dokka and Ross (1995) sug gested that the extension direction originally was N-S and subsequently was rotated clock wise to its current NE-SW orientation, but this contention has been disputed by Glazner et al (1996). Presently NW-striking normal faults in the southern San Joaquin basin, including the Edison and Tunis faults, were active during a late Oligocene-early Miocene extensional tec tonic event (Dibblee and Warne, 1988;Ten nyson, 1989;Goodman and Malin, 1992).…”
Section: Miocene Extension Versus Late Cretaceouspaleocene Extensionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…and (2) the Trans Mojave Sierran shear zone, active between 21 and 18 Ma [Dokka and Ross, 1995;Dokka et al, 1998]. These regimes are thought to be tectonically related to major intraplate, gravitationally driven transtension of the southwestern part of the North American plate in early Miocene time [Dokka and Ross, 1995;Dokka et al, 1998].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These regimes are thought to be tectonically related to major intraplate, gravitationally driven transtension of the southwestern part of the North American plate in early Miocene time [Dokka and Ross, 1995;Dokka et al, 1998]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%