2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collapse-performance-aided design optimization of steel concentrically braced frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one of the most impressive developments can be found by Larsen et al [398], a near-optimal truss design based on the homogenisation-based continuum TO. Practical applications of truss optimisation to bracing the systems design have some interesting contemporary examples in [399][400][401][402][403].…”
Section: Steel Elements Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one of the most impressive developments can be found by Larsen et al [398], a near-optimal truss design based on the homogenisation-based continuum TO. Practical applications of truss optimisation to bracing the systems design have some interesting contemporary examples in [399][400][401][402][403].…”
Section: Steel Elements Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hassanzadeh and Gholizadeh [ 15 ] investigated the collapse safety of optimally designed steel concentrically braced frames concerning brace fixation and optimal topology. The authors demonstrated that optimizing brace topologies can decrease initial cost and increase collapse safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the most popular approaches, heuristic methods like the sequential search algorithm (Zhang and Soong 1992) and its subsequent simplifications (Lopez Garcia 2001) and extensions (Wu et al 1997;Lopez Garcia and Soong 2002;Aguirre et al 2013), gradient-based optimisation methods like the incremental inverse problem approach (Takewaki 1997) and subsequent extensions (Takewaki et al 1999;Fujita et al 2010;Takewaki 2009;Aydin et al 2007;Ayding 2012), the fully stressed analysis/redesign procedure (Levy and Lavan 2006), evolutionary approaches like genetic algorithms (Singh and Moreschi 2002;Movaffaghi and Friberg 2006;Lavan and Dargush 2009;Silvestri and Trombetti 2007;Apostolakis 2020), multi-step design methods (Martinez-Rodrigo and Romero 2003;Silvestri et al 2010;Palermo et al 2018), direct displacement-based design procedures (Lin et al 2003;Sullivan et al 2012;Moradpour and Dehestani 2019) and stochasticbased approaches (Di Paola and Navarra 2009; Gidaris and Taflanidis 2015; Tubaldi and Kougioumtzoglou 2015; have been utilised. Addionally, nowadays metaheuristics are emerged as very efficient algorithms for tackling complex optimization problems (Fattahi and Gholizadeh 2019;Hassanzadeh and Gholizadeh 2019;Ghaderi and Gholizadeh 2021). Some studies also compared different damper distributions in view of the resulting seismic performance (Hwang et al 2013;Whittle et al 2012;Aguirre et al 2013;Del Gobbo et al 2018b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%