2020
DOI: 10.1186/s42466-020-00080-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collateral damages in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemia– two cases

Abstract: Background and aims At present, “severe acute respiratory syndrome new coronavirus” (SARS-CoV-2) affects the whole world and has led to a pandemia with almost 2.000.000 infected patients in the mid of April 2020 (WHO). Thus, health care specialists primarily focus on therapy of corona disease 2019 (COVID-19) and a lot of effort has been undertaken to get more manpower on intensive care units. However, the number of patients with life threatening diseases other than COVID-19 like heart attacks or strokes has no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in our view there is nothing specifically pediatric in his observations. Several recent papers discuss delays of diagnosis and treatment of non-COVID-19 diseases during the pandemic, including head and neck cancer, 2 appendicitis, 3 , 4 heart failure and septicemia, 5 pulmonary thromboembolism, 6 pyelonephritis, 7 and cancer in general. 8 Some patients in these papers are administratively still “children,” 1 , 3 , 7 some are adults, and appendicitis is discussed in both.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in our view there is nothing specifically pediatric in his observations. Several recent papers discuss delays of diagnosis and treatment of non-COVID-19 diseases during the pandemic, including head and neck cancer, 2 appendicitis, 3 , 4 heart failure and septicemia, 5 pulmonary thromboembolism, 6 pyelonephritis, 7 and cancer in general. 8 Some patients in these papers are administratively still “children,” 1 , 3 , 7 some are adults, and appendicitis is discussed in both.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%