Collecting and sharing self-generated health and lifestyle data: Understanding barriers for people living with long-term health conditions – a survey study

Abstract

Background The growing popularity of collecting self-generated health and lifestyle data presents a valuable opportunity to develop our understanding of long-term health conditions and improve care. Barriers remain to the effective sharing of health and lifestyle data by those living with long-term health conditions which include beliefs around concepts of Trust, Identity, Privacy and Security, experiences of stigma, perceptions of risk and information sensitivity. Method We surveyed 250 UK adults who reported living with a range of long-term health conditions. We recorded data to assess self-reported behaviours, experiences, attitudes and motivations relevant to sharing self-generated health and lifestyle data. We also asked participants about their beliefs about Trust, Identity, Privacy and Security, stigma, and perceptions of risk and information sensitivity regarding their health and lifestyle data. Results Three-quarters of our sample reported recording information about their health and lifestyle on a daily basis. However, two-thirds reported never or rarely sharing this information with others. Trust, Identity, Privacy and Security concerns were considered to be ‘very important’ by those with long-term health conditions when deciding whether or not to share self-generated health and lifestyle data with others, with security concerns considered most important. Of those living with a long-term health condition, 58% reported experiencing stigma associated with their condition. The greatest perceived risk from sharing with others was the potential for future harm to their social relationships. Conclusions Our findings suggest that, in order for health professionals and researchers to benefit from the increased prevalence of self-generated health and lifestyle data, more can be done to address security concerns and to understand perceived risks associated with data sharing. Digital platforms aimed at facilitating the sharing of self-generated health and lifestyle data may look to highlight security features, enable users to control the sharing of certain information types, and emphasise the practical benefits to users of sharing health and lifestyle data with others.

Canadian perspectives of digital mental health supports: Findings from a national survey conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…While recent federal efforts have resulted in affordable broadband access to 94% of Canadians, 57 , 58 which may reduce the potential bias of a web-based survey, other digital divide factors, such as a lack of digital literacy, may hinder participation and must be considered. Another source of bias is the low response rate; however, this rate is consistent with other web-panel studies 57 , 59 – 64 and is expected for population surveys of this length administered on the web and without financial incentive. 65 Lastly, the cross-sectional design provides a snapshot of the experience and needs of the population, especially with the dynamic nature of jurisdictional pandemic responses and their impact on Canadians.…”

People with long-term conditions sharing personal health data via digital health technologies: A scoping review to inform design

“…Thus, data sharing with others almost becomes a by-product rather than the main functionality. This is also supported by previous research [ 61 ] into barriers to sharing data which supports that data is shared overwhelmingly for better management of their own condition instead of improving the health of others. It is hence necessary to consider how to motivate users to keep sharing data and how data sharing can be used for an individual’s benefit.…”

A qualitative study of perceptions of control over potential causes of death and the sources of information that inform perceptions of risk

“…Most information concerning control over risk is received from ‘ Dr Google ’, though trusted sources such as the NHS and various health charities are sometimes reported as playing a vital role in validating this information. Trust is increasingly seen as a central component of engaging with digital health information, particularly among the growing portion of society living with existing health conditions (Brown et al, 2022a ; Brown et al, 2022b ; Simpson et al, 2021 ). Given the rise in health misinformation, and the belief that it is other people not ourselves that are typically susceptible to believing misinformation online, further attempts are needed to combat this growing ‘infodemic’.…”