2020
DOI: 10.26749/rstpp.154.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collecting history and distribution of the potentially invasive Disa bracteata (South African orchid) in Tasmania

Abstract: The collecting history of Disa bracteata Sw. (South African orchid) in Tasmania (Australia), the state's only naturalised member of the Orchidaceae family, is presented. Details of its distribution in Tasmania, since it was first discovered in 2005, are included and discussed with information on habitat, abundance and management. The species is primarily distributed across the north coast (Smithton to Musselroe) with an outlier in Huonville in the state's south. Most sites are from verges along public roads an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two other common, non-indigenous orchids on the island also serve as hosts, Arundina graminifolia and Dendrobium crumenatum, and may elevate weevil populations as well, with possible impacts on native species (Foster and Ackerman 2021). The other orchid which is considered by local authorities to constitute a threat to native plants is Disa bracteata which invaded Australia in 1944 (Wapstra et al 2020). However, in this case there is no evidence of negative effects on the Australian flora.…”
Section: Potential Versus Observed Geographical Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two other common, non-indigenous orchids on the island also serve as hosts, Arundina graminifolia and Dendrobium crumenatum, and may elevate weevil populations as well, with possible impacts on native species (Foster and Ackerman 2021). The other orchid which is considered by local authorities to constitute a threat to native plants is Disa bracteata which invaded Australia in 1944 (Wapstra et al 2020). However, in this case there is no evidence of negative effects on the Australian flora.…”
Section: Potential Versus Observed Geographical Rangementioning
confidence: 99%