Collecting mortality data via mobile phone surveys: A non-inferiority randomized trial in Malawi

Abstract

Despite the urgent need for timely mortality data in low-income and lower-middle-income countries, mobile phone surveys rarely include questions about recent deaths. Such questions might a) be too sensitive, b) take too long to ask and/or c) generate unreliable data. We assessed the feasibility of mortality data collection using mobile phone surveys in Malawi. We conducted a non-inferiority trial among a random sample of mobile phone users. Participants were allocated to an interview about their recent economic activity or recent deaths in their family. In the group that was asked mortality-related questions, half of the respondents completed an abridged questionnaire, focused on information necessary to calculate recent mortality rates, whereas the other half completed an extended questionnaire that also included questions about symptoms and healthcare. The primary trial outcome was the cooperation rate, i.e., the number of completed interviews divided by the number of mobile subscribers invited to participate. Secondary outcomes included self-reports of negative feelings and stated intentions to participate in future interviews. We called more than 7,000 unique numbers and reached 3,054 mobile subscribers. In total, 1,683 mobile users were invited to participate. The difference in cooperation rates between those asked to complete a mortality-related interview and those asked to answer questions about economic activity was 0.9 percentage points (95% CI = -2.3, 4.1), which satisfied the non-inferiority criterion. The mortality questionnaire was non-inferior to the economic questionnaire on all secondary outcomes. Collecting mortality data required 2 to 4 additional minutes per reported death, depending on the inclusion of questions about symptoms and healthcare. More than half of recent deaths elicited during mobile phone interviews had not been registered with the National Registration Bureau. Including mortality-related questions in mobile phone surveys is feasible. It might help strengthen the surveillance of mortality in countries with deficient civil registration systems. Registration: AEA RCT Registry, #0008065 (14 September 2021).

Enhancing SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in Malawi using telephone syndromic surveillance from July 2020 to April 2022

“…32 Our findings underscore the utility of telephonic surveillance as a feasible approach to better assess the mortality burden of SARS-CoV-2 in low-resource settings. 33 …”

Role and effectiveness of telephone hotlines in outbreak response in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…One study in Papua New Guinea showed that health workers successfully used mobile phones for notification of deaths and verbal autopsy as part of their mortality surveillance programme adopted by the government [ 44 ]. In Malawi, another study found that more than half the deaths reported using mobile phones were not registered in the National Registration Bureau [ 45 ].…”

The Gendered Consequences of COVID-19 for Internal Migration

“…We collected panel data from men and women in Kenya and Nigeria across three rounds during the pandemic: Round 1 (November–January, 2020–2021), Round 2 (March–April 2021), and Round 3 (November–January 2021–2022). Given the challenges in conducting surveys in-person, performing phone interviews was a common option during the pandemic (Josephson et al, 2021 ; Chasukwa et al, 2022 ). Our sampling frame was based on a Rapid Digit Dial (RDD) framework, a frequently administered approach in public opinion research (Gallup, 2008 ).…”