Collection-Based Education by Distance and Face to Face: Learning Outcomes and Academic Dishonesty

Abstract

Assembling and curating specimen collections is a valuable educational exercise that integrates subject-specific skills such as field collection, curation, identification, organization, and interpretation of relationships. Collection projects have been used primarily in face-to-face classes, but they can be readily adapted for distance education. The primary challenges to using collection projects in distance education center on two concerns: (1) whether distance students learn as much as their face-toface peers and (2) whether academic dishonesty occurs more often in distance education than face to face. This study addressed both concerns by assessing learning outcomes in two entomology courses with both face-to-face and distance sections and evaluating the frequency of specimen-based plagiarism (submitting specimens collected by someone else). An ungraded survey testing students' insect identification knowledge found equivalent learning outcomes in face-to-face and distance classes. Insect collections were monitored for plagiarized (resubmitted or purchased) specimens in a 5-year Bmark-release-recapture^investigation. Academic dishonesty was detected in fewer than 2% of collections; cheating was more than 12 times more likely in distance than in face-to-face classes. This study's findings raise the possibility that distance learning assessments can be artificially inflated by cheating, suggesting that evaluations of distance learning should be considered in light of academic dishonesty. These results highlight the benefits and challenges of collections as teaching tools in distance education and underscore the need for instructors to be vigilant about academic integrity.

Understanding the Most Important Facilitators and Barriers for Online Education during COVID-19 through Online Photovoice Methodology

“…In contrast, online education could lead instructors and students to resort to unethical plagiarism (Ubell, 2017). Lucky et al (2019) discussed that the rate of students who resort to academic fraud in online education (distance education) was 12 times higher than the rate in face-to-face education. Furthermore, according to certain studies, there was no significant difference between learning outcomes in online and face-to-face education (Allen & Seaman, 2010;Allen et al, 2002;Biner et al, 1995;Brown & Liedholm, 2002).…”

COMMUNITY COLLEGE CORNERChallenges and Opportunities during COVID

“…Standards, Plagiarism and Academic Dishonesty. Although educational researchers found that students who took online classes were less likely to cheat as compared with the students who took face-to-face courses [10,11], keeping the academic integrity in a "virtual classroom" remains an open problem for online teaching. For computing courses, such as computer science/programming, there is enough available material online such as Wikipedia, blogs and forums, and of course YouTube, where most traditional course material can be found expeditiously.…”

Motivational Values of Ukrainian Students and the Use of Distance Learning Form in Legal Education

“…Of course, scientists, teachers and managers in the education sector confirmed the role of the distance learning form in studying the law (Wu, 2015;Lucky, Branham & Atchison, 2019;Muilenburg & Berge, 2005). Therefore, practical scientific activity may be unfolded using distance courses that are significant.…”