2019
DOI: 10.1080/01462679.2019.1579012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collection Creation as Collection Management: Libraries as Publishers and Implications for Collection Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instantiation of more diverse, representative, and therefore impactful, information in the healthcare knowledge base may require LIS innovation. To this end, Herther (2020) advocates for information professionals to influence vendors and creators, while Gwynn et al (2019) propose LIS involvement in authorship.…”
Section: Decolonisation and Collection Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instantiation of more diverse, representative, and therefore impactful, information in the healthcare knowledge base may require LIS innovation. To this end, Herther (2020) advocates for information professionals to influence vendors and creators, while Gwynn et al (2019) propose LIS involvement in authorship.…”
Section: Decolonisation and Collection Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LIS inherently lends itself to interdisciplinarity, with adjacent disciplines of publishing and authorship as vehicles for change (Gwynn et al, 2019). Libraries' capacity to collaborate, whether in establishing data standards, advocating for inclusion, or facilitation of outsider voices, can disrupt power structures (Inefuku & Roh, 2016).…”
Section: Tenet: Interdisciplinaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5.1 synthesises a range of sources to illustrate the wide variety of activities and programs initiated by libraries in Asia, Europe and North America. Engaged libraries have moved beyond partnering with other cultural heritage institutions on digitisation programs to working with local organisations and individuals on knowledge exchange projects to preserve and 'publish' both historical and contemporary hidden materials, using public scanning events and oral history interviews to collect both analog and born-digital items, and thereby create, document and contextualise community and family histories as resources to support academic and community research and learning (Cho 2011;Gwynn, Henry & Craft 2019;McIntosh, Mangum & Phillips 2017). Libraries are also repurposing their institutional repositories as expertise locators (expert finders) to support institutional knowledge exchange endeavours (Sidorko & Yang 2011) and as public archives for digital artefacts (project documentation and final outputs) from communitycentred work, such as campus events and community-based teaching and learning (Makula 2019;Miller & Billings 2012;Moore, Collins & Johnston 2020).…”
Section: Communities and Citizensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This calls for more acquisition of information resources in digital formats and more digitizing of resources initiatives. Academic libraries at national and global levels are growing their collections of new forms of digital scholarship to improve access and to make contents widely available for users (Gwynn, Henry, & Craft, 2019). Sharing data involved extensive labour and skills which sometimes goes unrewarded (Borgman, Scharnhorst, & Golshan, 2019).…”
Section: The Rise Of Digital Resources In Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%