1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.38111299056316.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collection of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cells by two protocols on an apheresis system

Abstract: Both apheresis protocols collect sufficient numbers of PBSCs for allogeneic transplantation. The AutoPBSC operates in a fully automatic fashion, avoiding manual adjustment and interindividual variations. The loss of platelets is lower with AutoPBSC than with Version 4.7, but the apheresis time is slightly longer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing leukapheresis volumes and components obtained with the two collection strategies, our results are in agreement with data from literature showing a major difference in the harvest volume, which is generally higher when V4.7 is applied [13,17]. Probably, an enrichment of nucleated cells is obtained with V4.7, also in MM patients higher preleukapheresis WBC counts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When comparing leukapheresis volumes and components obtained with the two collection strategies, our results are in agreement with data from literature showing a major difference in the harvest volume, which is generally higher when V4.7 is applied [13,17]. Probably, an enrichment of nucleated cells is obtained with V4.7, also in MM patients higher preleukapheresis WBC counts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Probably, an enrichment of nucleated cells is obtained with V4.7, also in MM patients higher preleukapheresis WBC counts. On the other hand, in our study, the number of platelets collected with V4.7 was significantly lower than reported, either in the PBSC collections from patients with a variety of malignancies or allogeneic donors [12,17,18] or in the MNC collection [19] when compared with V6.0. As a matter of fact, in our data, platelets CE% and RBC contamination was similar in both aphereses system, while hemoglobin was more concentrated in V6.0 harvest.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…The product yields and CE of white blood cells (WBCs), MNCs, and CD34+ cells, and residual PLTs were enumerated. CE calculations were based on the total blood volumes (TBVs) of donors and patients (TBV‐CE) or the cell numbers passed through the instrument (CE1) TBV-CE = number of collected cells × 100 / preapheresis cell count × TBV . TBV-CE = number of collected cells × 100 / preapheresis cell count × TBV . …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported advantages of Spectra‐Auto, comparing with other apheresis platforms, are decreased citrate toxicity, less PLT contamination, and feasible CEs 14‐19. However, there are few direct comparisons of Spectra‐MNC and Spectra‐Auto, and uncertainty remains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD34+ cell collection efficiency [6,7] and recruitment factor [8][9][10] for the various cell populations were calculated as previously described.…”
Section: Laboratory Evaluation Of Peripheral Blood and Leukapheresis mentioning
confidence: 99%