1985
DOI: 10.1093/nar/13.suppl.r105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collection of published 5S, 5.8S and 4.5S ribosomal RNA sequences

Abstract: The 1984 collection (1) of mature 5 S and 5.8 S rRNA sequences is updated. The sequences reported here are based on actual sequence determinations and not on oligonucleotide catalogues. Some of the earlier published oligonucleotide catalogues are given in reference 2.We would like to thank those colleagues who have sent us their pre-or reprints on small ribosomal RNA sequences in 1984, and who have pointed out mistakes in our previous collection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…are usually not included in the coryneform bacteria in bacterial taxonomy because of their morphological differences. This seems to be a good example of the hypothesis that differences in phenotypic (including morphological) characteristics are sometimes superficial and do not always represent the phylo- (3,13 Our previous tree (1) essentially agrees with that in Fig. 4; both the trees show that Streptomyces and Micrococcus spp., the low-G+C gram-positive bacteria, and the gramnegative bacteria separated from one another at early times of bacterial evolution, although in the previous tree, Streptomyces and Micrococcus spp.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…are usually not included in the coryneform bacteria in bacterial taxonomy because of their morphological differences. This seems to be a good example of the hypothesis that differences in phenotypic (including morphological) characteristics are sometimes superficial and do not always represent the phylo- (3,13 Our previous tree (1) essentially agrees with that in Fig. 4; both the trees show that Streptomyces and Micrococcus spp., the low-G+C gram-positive bacteria, and the gramnegative bacteria separated from one another at early times of bacterial evolution, although in the previous tree, Streptomyces and Micrococcus spp.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The boundaries of individual stems were defined by keeping only those positions establishing base-pairing interactions in more than 80% of the taxa. Both A-U and G-C as well as G-U matches (Erdman et al 1985) were considered as belonging to stems. This conservative selection resulted in 35 stems representing 433 positions (44.7% of the aligned positions), a model which appears suitable for all the 43 mammals investigated, marsupials included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequencing of 16s rRNA and of 23s rRNA have great sensitivity. In addition, 5s rRNA sequence determination can be useful (Erdman et al, 1985), however there are limitations due to the small size of the macromolecule and the amount of information gained. Genes encoding 16s rRNA genes (16s rDNA) are amplified in vitro by using PCR.…”
Section: Rrna Oligonucleotide Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%